A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Lower Back Pain: Outcomes at Six-Month Follow Up.

Choi, Jong Bum; Koh, Jae Chul; Jo, Daehyun; Kim, Jae Hyung; Chang, Won Sok; Lim, Kang Taek; Lee, Hyung Gon; Moon, Ho Sik; Kim, Eunsoo; Lee, Sun Yeul; Park, Kibeom; Choi, Yi Hwa; Park, Sang Jun; Oh, Jinyoung; Lee, Sook Young; Park, Bumhee; Jun, Eun Kyung; Ko, Yeong Seung; Kim, Ji Su; Ha, Eunji

Background and Objectives: Endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN) facilitates adhesiolysis through direct epiduroscopic visualization, offering more precise neural decompression than that exhibited by percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN). We aimed to compare the effects of EEN and PEN for 6 months after treatment with lower back and radicular pain in patients. Methods: This retrospective study compared the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores in patients with low back and radicular pain who underwent EEN or PEN with a steering catheter. The medical records of 107 patients were analyzed, with 73 and 34 undergoing EEN and PEN, respectively. Results: The VAS and ODI scores decreased at all time points after EEN and PEN. VAS and ODI scores decreased more in the EEN group than those in the PEN group at 1 day and 1- and 6-months post-procedure, indicating superior pain relief for both lower back and radicular pain through EEN. Conclusions: EEN is a superior treatment of pain control than PEN in lower back and radicular pain patients.

LUMBAR pain; ANALGESIA; VISUAL analog scale; PAIN management; COMPARATIVE studies; MEDICAL records

Medicina (1010660X), 2024, Vol 60, Issue 5, p839

1010-660X

Academic Journal

10.3390/medicina60050839