Comparison of Screw-In Forces during Movement of Endodontic Files with Different Geometries, Alloys, and Kinetics.

Kim, Sung Kyo; Ha, Jung-Hong; Kwak, Sang Won; Kim, Hyeon-Cheol; Lee, Chan-Joo

This study compared the maximum screw-in forces of various instruments during their movements. Forty simulated canals in resin blocks were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10): ProTaper Universal F2, ProTaper Gold F2, WaveOne Primary, and WaveOne Gold Primary. To standardize a lumen size, all artificial canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal F1. The rotation speed was set at 350 rpm with an automated 4 mm pecking motion at a speed of 1 mm/s. The pecking depth was increased by 1 mm for each pecking motion until the file reached the working length. During instrumentation, screw-in forces were automatically recorded by customized software. Maximum screw-in forces were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc comparison with the significance level at 0.05. WaveOne Gold files generated the lowest maximum screw-in forces, followed by ProTaper Gold, WaveOne, and ProTaper Universal (p < 0.05). Under the condition of this study, heat-treated nickel–titanium (NiTi) files with smaller cross-sectional area, fewer contact points, and reciprocating movements resulted in a lower screw-in effect.

CANALS; RESIN concrete; SPEED; COMPUTER software; NICKEL; TITANIUM

Materials (1996-1944), 2019, Vol 12, Issue 9, p1506

1996-1944

Academic Journal

10.3390/ma12091506