Works matching Pro-life movement
1
- Revista de Comunicación, 2022, v. 21, n. 1, p. 411, doi. 10.26441/RC21.1-2022-A21
- Tarullo, R.;
- Sampietro, A.
- Article
2
- Catholic Historical Review, 2011, v. 97, n. 3, p. 527, doi. 10.1353/cat.2011.0098
- Article
3
- U.S. Catholic Historian, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.1353/cht.2016.0007
- Article
4
- Politics & Governance, 2018, v. 6, n. 3, p. 112, doi. 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1479
- Article
5
- Human Life Review, 2016, v. 42, n. 4, p. 33
- Article
6
- Human Life Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 87
- Article
7
- Review of Religious Research, 1990, v. 31, n. 4, p. 380, doi. 10.2307/3511563
- Wilcox, Clyde;
- Gomez, Leopoldo
- Article
8
- Sociological Spectrum, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/02732173.2014.878624
- Article
9
- Latin American Law Review, 2021, n. 6, p. 125, doi. 10.29263/lar06.2021.06
- Article
10
- Religions, 2015, v. 6, n. 2, p. 451, doi. 10.3390/rel6020451
- Article
12
- Human Life Review, 2022, v. 48, n. 3, p. 44
- Article
13
- Human Life Review, 2021, v. 47, n. 4, p. 102
- Article
14
- Human Life Review, 2019, v. 45, n. 4, p. 19
- Article
15
- Human Life Review, 2018, v. 44, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
16
- Human Life Review, 2011, v. 37, n. 1/2, p. 25
- Article
17
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1989, v. 75, n. 2, p. 166, doi. 10.1080/00335638909383870
- Article
21
- Society, 2017, v. 54, n. 3, p. 238, doi. 10.1007/s12115-017-0130-0
- Article
25
- National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2024, v. 24, n. 4, p. 697, doi. 10.5840/ncbq202424454
- Article
26
- Critical Review (08913811), 2011, v. 23, n. 4, p. 495, doi. 10.1080/08913811.2011.664853
- Article
27
- Chasqui (13901079), 2018, n. 139, p. 231
- PÁEZ GONZÁLEZ, Clara Lorena;
- DE LA PEÑA GARCÍA, Antonio
- Article
28
- Human Life Review, 2021, v. 47, n. 2, p. 79
- Article
29
- Human Life Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 2, p. 78
- Article
30
- Human Life Review, 2016, v. 42, n. 3, p. 31
- Article
31
- Gender & Research / Gender a Výzkum, 2022, v. 23, n. 1, p. 99, doi. 10.13060/gav.2022.007
- Article
32
- Sociological Forum, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 769, doi. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01211.x
- Article
33
- Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2021, v. 42, n. 2, p. 124, doi. 10.1080/1554477X.2021.1842667
- Article
34
- Doxa Comunicación, 2022, n. 34, p. 358
- Cañizares, Alicia Latorre
- Article
35
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2022, v. 18, n. 2, p. 338, doi. 10.1177/1743872117690347
- Von Hagel, Alisa;
- Mansbach, Daniela
- Article
36
- Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 2024, v. 24, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1177/15327086231218460
- Article
37
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
38
- Politics & Gender, 2020, v. 16, n. 2, p. 552, doi. 10.1017/S1743923X18001034
- Article
39
- Young Scholars in Writing, 2021, v. 18, p. 27
- Article
40
- Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 2013, v. 28, n. 2, p. 232
- Article
41
- Human Life Review, 2024, v. 50, n. 3/4, p. 90
- Article
43
- Human Life Review, 2009, v. 35, n. 4, p. 25
- Article
44
- Human Life Review, 2009, v. 35, n. 1/2, p. 29
- Article
45
- Human Life Review, 2003, v. 29, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
46
- Human Life Review, 2002, v. 28, n. 3, p. 78
- Article
47
- Latin American Politics & Society, 2021, v. 63, n. 3, p. 21, doi. 10.1017/lap.2021.21
- Article
48
- Anthropology Today, 2010, v. 26, n. 4, p. 4, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2010.00745.x
- Smith, Alexander Thomas T.
- Article
49
- Religious Studies Review (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 2025, v. 51, n. 1, p. 150, doi. 10.1111/rsr.17645
- Article
50
- Social Science Journal, 1994, v. 31, n. 3, p. 319, doi. 10.1016/0362-3319(94)90027-2
- Article