Works matching Trials (Libel)
1
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 2, p. 758
- Article
2
- Law & History Review, 2023, v. 41, n. 4, p. 683, doi. 10.1017/S0738248023000275
- Article
3
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2015, v. 20, n. 4, p. 133
- Article
4
- History Today, 2011, v. 61, n. 2, p. 10
- Article
5
- Journal of Legal History, 2012, v. 33, n. 2, p. 209, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2012.698886
- Article
7
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 29, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
8
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 4, p. 617, doi. 10.3138/utlj.61.4.617
- Article
9
- Catholic Historical Review, 1994, v. 80, n. 3, p. 457
- Article
10
- Notes & Queries, 1942, v. 183, n. 10, p. 288-a
- MICKLEWRIGHT, F. H. AMPHLETT
- Article
11
- Nature, 1996, v. 380, n. 6573, p. 369
- Article
12
- Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2008, v. 13, n. 2, p. 229
- Article
13
- Journalism History, 2007, v. 33, n. 3, p. 173, doi. 10.1080/00947679.2007.12062741
- Article
14
- California Law Review, 1986, v. 74, n. 3, p. 883, doi. 10.2307/3480398
- Article
15
- Communication Law & Policy, 2010, v. 15, n. 2, p. 91, doi. 10.1080/10811681003666588
- Article
16
- Communication Law & Policy, 2004, v. 9, n. 4, p. 567, doi. 10.1207/s15326926clp0904_7
- Article
17
- Social History, 1981, v. 6, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/03071028108567499
- Article
18
- Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 2009, v. 15, n. 10, p. 1135, doi. 10.1089/acm.2009.0422
- Article
21
- Midland History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1179/0047729X15Z.00000000058
- Article
22
- Chinese Law & Government, 2013, v. 46, n. 5/6, p. 100, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609460512
- Article
24
- Journalism Quarterly, 1989, v. 66, n. 3, p. 646, doi. 10.1177/107769908906600317
- Article
25
- Journalism Quarterly, 1989, v. 66, n. 3, p. 640, doi. 10.1177/107769908906600316
- Article
26
- Alternative Law Journal, 1996, v. 21, n. 1, p. 50
- Article
27
- Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 2009, v. 32, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1111/j.1754-0208.2008.00108.x
- Article
29
- Boston College Law Review, 2009, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1373
- Article
30
- Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social & Cultural Series, 2006, v. 43, n. 3, p. 16581C, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-825X.2006.00294.x
- Article
31
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2004, v. 98, n. 2, p. 473
- Article
32
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 4, p. 1265
- Article
33
- Utah Law Review, 2008, v. 2008, n. 3, p. 875
- Article
34
- Women's Studies, 2018, v. 47, n. 5, p. 541, doi. 10.1080/00497878.2018.1479706
- Article
35
- East European Jewish Affairs, 2017, v. 47, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1080/13501674.2017.1322819
- Article
36
- Italianist, 2005, v. 25, n. 2, p. 239, doi. 10.1179/026143405X77416
- Article
37
- Contemporary British History, 2011, v. 25, n. 4, p. 521, doi. 10.1080/13619462.2011.623862
- Article
39
- Medical History, 2012, v. 56, n. 2, p. 277, doi. 10.1017/mdh.2011.37
- Article
40
- Women's History Review, 2013, v. 22, n. 2, p. 253, doi. 10.1080/09612025.2012.726114
- Article
41
- Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2014, v. 2014, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
42
- Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 2011, v. 7, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1515/JPLR.2011.003
- Johnson, Alison;
- Clifford, Ruth
- Article
43
- Gesnerus, 2011, v. 68, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1163/22977953-06801004
- Article
45
- At the Interface / Probing the Boundaries, 2017, n. 90, p. 3, doi. 10.1163/9789004350816_002
- Article
46
- Social History, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 182, doi. 10.1080/03071022.2014.905277
- Article
47
- History Today, 2000, v. 50, n. 6, p. 9
- Article
48
- Law & Literature, 2016, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/1535685X.2015.1127685
- Article
49
- Antisemitism Studies, 2022, v. 6, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.2979/antistud.6.1.03
- Article
50
- 2010
- Polden, Patrick;
- Grzeszczyk, Grzegorz;
- Banks, Steve
- Book Review