Works matching Judicial restraint
1
- SMU Law Review, 2019, v. 72, n. 2, p. 235
- Article
2
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2018, v. 41, n. 2, p. 380, doi. 10.53637/xhpu9987
- Article
4
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 4, p. 989
- Article
5
- Texas Law Review, 2019, v. 98, n. 2, p. 215
- Article
6
- National Security Law Journal, 2025, v. 12, n. 1, p. 101
- Article
7
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 363
- Article
8
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 925
- Article
9
- Campbell Law Review, 2024, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Te Mata Koi: Auckland University Law Review, 2012, v. 18, p. 137
- Article
11
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2017, v. 36, n. 2, p. 259
- CAHILL, MARIA;
- CONAILL, SEÁN Ó.
- Article
12
- Utah Bar Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 6, p. 12
- Article
13
- FIU Law Review, 2017, v. 12, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
14
- American Journal of Legal History, 2020, v. 60, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njaa006
- Article
15
- Seattle University Law Review, 2014, v. 37, n. 2, p. 865
- Article
17
- International Studies Quarterly, 2020, v. 64, n. 4, p. 770, doi. 10.1093/isq/sqaa047
- Stiansen, Øyvind;
- Voeten, Erik
- Article
18
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2016, v. 46, n. 2, p. 387, doi. 10.1111/psq.12275
- Article
19
- Revista Inciso, 2023, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.18634/incj.25v.2i.1459
- GALLEGO RODRÍGUEZ, LUZ KARIME
- Article
20
- Quaestio Iuris (QI), 2017, v. 10, n. 1, p. 519, doi. 10.12957/rqi.2017.22847
- Oliveira Avila, Ana Paula;
- Mi randa, Paula Mandagará
- Article
21
- ICL Journal, 2019, v. 13, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1515/icl-2019-0002
- Article
22
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 78, n. 6, p. 511, doi. 10.1177/0022018314557413
- Article
23
- Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 2009, v. 37, n. 4, p. 335, doi. 10.1177/009318530903700403
- DEMIER, RICHART L.;
- SARRAZIN, ROBERT G.
- Article
24
- Studies on Authoritarianism & Totalitarianism / Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem, 2023, v. 45, n. 2, p. 7, doi. 10.19195/2300-7249.45.2.1
- Article
25
- Human Rights Law Review, 2024, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngad032
- Article
26
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 3, p. 621
- Article
29
- 2012
- Epstein, Lee;
- Landes, William M.
- Essay
30
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 871
- Article
31
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 823
- Article
32
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2010, v. 17, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
33
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
34
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1043
- Article
35
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 42, n. 3, p. 361
- Article
36
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2023, v. 17, n. 2, p. 389
- Article
38
- Constitutional Commentary, 2005, v. 22, n. 2, p. 271
- Article
39
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2010, v. 60, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.3138/utlj.60.1.23
- Article
40
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1997, v. 145, n. 4, p. 759, doi. 10.2307/3312699
- Article
41
- Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 9, n. 3, p. 425, doi. 10.3249/1868-1581-9-3-mawar
- Article
42
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2024, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1111
- Article
43
- Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2020, v. 49, n. 2, p. 179, doi. 10.5553/NJLP/221307132020049002004
- Article
46
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2024, v. 28, n. 2, p. 699
- Article
48
- Florida Tax Review, 2020, v. 24, n. 1, p. 277
- Article
49
- Denver Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 3, p. 725
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 409
- Article