Works matching DE "CHARTER of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000)"
1
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 144, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2013.801592
- Article
2
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2012.646798
- Fuster, GloriaGonzález;
- Gellert, Raphaël
- Article
3
- International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2019, v. 133, n. 1, p. 317, doi. 10.1007/s00414-018-1880-y
- Keller, E.;
- Santos, C.;
- Cusack, D.;
- Väli, M.;
- Ferrara, D.;
- Ludes, B.;
- Mangin, P.;
- Payne-James, J. J.;
- Vieira, D. N.
- Article
4
- Revista de Derecho Politico, 2013, n. 87, p. 79
- LÓPEZ-POZAS, FERNANDO L. IBÁÑEZ
- Article
5
- Revista de Derecho Politico, 2013, n. 87, p. 103
- ACRACIA NÚÑEZ MARTÍNEZ, MARÍA
- Article
6
- Revista Española de Pedagogía, 2007, n. 238, p. 479
- Ibáñez-Martín, José Antonio
- Article
7
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2018, n. 4, p. 11
- Article
8
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2013, n. 4, p. 37
- Article
9
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2013, p. 145
- Article
10
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2013, p. 80
- Article
11
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2013, p. 11
- Article
12
- Sphere of Politics / Sfera Politicii, 2014, v. 22, n. 4/5, p. 54
- DUMITRU, ANGELA-RAMONA;
- BASARABĂ, ADRIAN-COSMIN
- Article
13
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. 350, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12407
- Article
14
- Modern Law Review, 2015, v. 78, n. 3, p. 535, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12127
- Article
15
- Computer und Recht, 2024, v. 40, n. 3, p. 177, doi. 10.9785/cr-2024-400311
- Article
16
- Juridical Current, 2012, v. 15, n. 2, p. 44
- Article
17
- LESIJ - Lex ET Scientia International Journal, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 180
- Article
18
- European Law Journal, 2017, v. 23, n. 1/2, p. 94, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12226
- Nicolosi, Salvatore Fabio
- Article
19
- European Law Journal, 2015, v. 21, n. 5, p. 657, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12137
- Article
20
- European Law Journal, 2014, v. 20, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12047
- Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda;
- Gameiro, Maria Inês
- Article
21
- European Law Journal, 2013, v. 19, n. 4, p. 517, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12042
- Article
22
- European Law Journal, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 251, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x
- Article
23
- Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2020, v. 40, n. 1, p. 229, doi. 10.24425/pyil.2021.138438
- Maliszewska-Nienartowicz, Justyna
- Article
24
- Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2018, v. 38, n. 1, p. 209, doi. 10.24425/pyil.2019.129613
- Article
25
- Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, 2019, n. 39, p. 109, doi. 10.15366/rjuam2019.39.003
- FERNÁNDEZ-LASQUETTY MARTÍN, JAVIER
- Article
26
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2014, n. 37, p. 316
- Article
27
- Liverpool Law Review, 2012, v. 33, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1007/s10991-012-9121-9
- Article
28
- NaUKMA Research Papers. Law, 2021, v. 7, p. 96, doi. 10.18523/2617-2607.2021.7.96-101
- Article
29
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2016, v. 25, n. 3, p. 292, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2016.1239564
- Flórez Rojas, Maria Lorena
- Article
30
- International Public Administration Review / Mednarodna Revija za Javno Upravo, 2015, v. 13, n. 1, p. 135, doi. 10.17573/ipar.2015.1.07
- Article
31
- Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu-Letters & Social Sciences Series, 2012, n. 2, p. 80
- Article
32
- European Review of Contract Law, 2012, v. 8, n. 3, p. 326, doi. 10.1515/ercl-2012-0326
- Article
33
- European Review of Contract Law, 2010, v. 6, n. 4, p. 409, doi. 10.1515/ERCL.2010.409
- Article
34
- George Mason Law Review, 2019, v. 26, n. 4, p. 1331
- Article
35
- Judicial Review, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 115, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2015.1073040
- Article
36
- Judicial Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 3, p. 160, doi. 10.5235/10854681.19.3.160
- Article
37
- Judicial Review, 2012, v. 17, n. 3, p. 203, doi. 10.5235/108546812802915758
- Article
38
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 4, p. 374, doi. 10.5235/108546811799320835
- Article
39
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 2, p. 170, doi. 10.5235/108546811796167758
- Article
40
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 3, p. 216, doi. 10.5235/108546811797434048
- Article
41
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.5235/108546811796167721
- Beal, Kieron;
- Hickman, Tom
- Article
42
- Legal Studies, 2021, v. 41, n. 1, p. 130, doi. 10.1017/lst.2020.35
- Article
43
- Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, v. 57, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1556/2052.2016.57.1.5
- Article
44
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 3, p. 434, doi. 10.3366/elr.2024.0925
- Article
45
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2018, v. 22, n. 1, p. 126, doi. 10.3366/elr.2018.0463
- Article
46
- Journal of Modern Science, 2020, v. 45, n. 2, p. 105, doi. 10.13166/JMS/130707
- Article
47
- European Competition & Regulatory Law Review, 2018, v. 2, n. 3, p. 232, doi. 10.21552/core/2018/3/11
- Article
48
- Comunicación y Sociedad, 2011, v. 24, n. 1, p. 119
- Article
49
- German Law Journal, 2019, v. 20, n. 6, p. 840, doi. 10.1017/glj.2019.65
- Article
50
- German Law Journal, 2019, v. 20, n. 6, p. 779, doi. 10.1017/glj.2019.62
- Article