Works matching Google Inc.
1
- Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2018, v. 20, n. 3, p. 271, doi. 10.32709/akusosbil.407405
- ŞEKERLİ, Eyüp Bayram;
- AKÇETİN, Eyüp
- Article
2
- Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 14, n. 4, p. 761, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngu033
- Article
3
- Revista Eptic Online, 2019, v. 21, n. 3, p. 174
- Article
4
- Economic Researcher Review, 2017, n. 8, p. 112
- منصور بن اعمارة;
- إيمان ب وقروة
- Article
5
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2012, v. 15, p. 305
- Article
6
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2009, v. 12, p. 303
- Article
7
- Conflict Resolution & Negotiation Journal, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 48
- Piao, Meirui;
- Kleiner, Brian
- Article
8
- Iowa Law Review, 2009, v. 95, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
9
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2020, v. 6, n. 1, p. 143, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2020/1/20
- Miadzvetskaya, Yuliya;
- Van Calster, Geert
- Article
10
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2014, v. 17, p. 353
- Article
11
- Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 2012, v. 36, n. 4, p. 885, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00434_2.x
- Article
12
- Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 2012, v. 36, n. 4, p. 863, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00434.x
- Article
13
- Tennessee Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
14
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2016, v. 2, n. 2, p. 236, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2016/2/15
- Article
15
- New York Law School Law Review, 2010, v. 55, n. 1, p. 333
- Article
16
- New York Law School Law Review, 2007, v. 52, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
17
- Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 2024, v. 24, n. 1, p. 281
- Nancu, Dorinela;
- Barzecu, Ana-Maria
- Article
18
- Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 2024, v. 24, n. 1, p. 275
- Nancu, Dorinela;
- Barzecu, Ana-Maria
- Article
19
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2016, v. 46, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
20
- Loyola Law Review, 2016, v. 62, n. 1, p. 189
- Article
21
- Sydney Law Review, 2012, v. 34, n. 3, p. 587
- Article
22
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 589
- Article
23
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2019, v. 21, p. 159
- Article
24
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2015, v. 18, p. 287
- Article
25
- Propiedad Inmaterial, 2018, n. 26, p. 143, doi. 10.18601/16571959.n26.06
- Article
26
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
27
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 27, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
28
- Prudentia Iuris, 2023, n. 95, p. 203, doi. 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.203-215
- Article
29
- Sydney Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 4, p. 601
- Article
30
- Journal of the California Dental Association, 2016, v. 44, n. 8, p. 526
- Article
31
- Computer Law Review International, 2021, v. 22, n. 3, p. 65, doi. 10.9785/cri-2021-220302
- Article
32
- Computer Law Review International, 2015, v. 16, n. 1, p. 18, doi. 10.9785/cri-2015-0106
- Article
33
- Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2013, v. 24, n. 1/2, p. 48, doi. 10.1080/14783363.2012.733256
- Steiber, Annika;
- Alänge, Sverker
- Article
34
- Journal of Business & Technology Law, 2022, v. 17, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
35
- Law, State & Telecommunications Review / Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 2020, v. 12, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.26512/lstr.v12i2.34688
- Article
36
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 495
- Article
37
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 403
- Article
38
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 361
- Article
39
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2007, v. 47, n. 4, p. 441
- Article
40
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021, v. 16, n. 6, p. 463, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpab089
- Vaitkūnaitė, Ieva;
- Beniušis, Mindaugas;
- Jurčys, Paulius
- Article
41
- Pravnik, Law & Society Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 96, p. 151
- Article
42
- AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis, 2023, v. 11, n. 1, p. 336
- DE LA VEGA GARCÍA, Fernando
- Article
43
- Iuris Tantum, 2022, v. 36, n. 35, p. 139, doi. 10.36105/iut.2022n35.06
- Olmedo Piña, César Enrique
- Article
44
- Chasqui (13901079), 2016, n. 133, p. 113, doi. 10.16921/chasqui.v0i133.2939
- VERCELLI, Ariel;
- BECERRA, Lucas;
- BIDINOST, Agustín
- Article
45
- Forum Geografic, 2020, v. 19, n. 2, p. 158, doi. 10.5775/fg.2020.094.d
- LAZĂR, Andi Mihai;
- MARIN, Andreea Florentina;
- NEDELEA, Alexandru
- Article
46
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2014, n. 38, p. 110
- ÁLVAREZ RIGAUDIA, CECILIA
- Article
47
- Honors in Practice, 2022, v. 18, p. 151
- Article
48
- Revista Anagramas, 2014, v. 13, n. 25, p. 95
- Article
49
- Journal of Economics & Business Research, 2017, v. 23, n. 1, p. 123
- Bui Trung Thieu;
- Nguyen Thi Minh Hieu;
- Nguyen Thi Le Huyen;
- Pham Chau Binh;
- Nguyen Vu Hoang
- Article
50
- Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, v. 83, n. 3, p. 489, doi. 10.1007/s10551-007-9633-8
- Article