Works matching DE "PATENT infringement"
1
- Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter, 2025, v. 39, n. 6, p. 342, doi. 10.33196/wbl202506034201
- Article
2
- Texas Law Review, 2025, v. 103, n. 7, p. 1581
- Article
3
- Global Economy Journal, 2005, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.2202/1524-5861.1050
- Article
4
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2014, v. 19, n. 3, p. 96
- Article
5
- William & Mary Law Review, 2025, v. 66, n. 5, p. 1155
- Article
6
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 6, p. 2057
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 3, p. 773
- Article
8
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2005, v. 8, n. 1, p. 112
- Article
9
- Southern Economic Journal, 2009, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1067, doi. 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2009.tb00947.x
- Article
10
- Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009, v. 34, n. 2, p. 182, doi. 10.1007/s10961-007-9066-7
- Article
11
- Michigan Technology Law Review, 2024, v. 31, p. 73
- Article
12
- Michigan Technology Law Review, 2021, v. 28, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.36645/mtlr.28.1.empirical
- Article
13
- Michigan Technology Law Review, 2019, v. 26, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.36645/mtlr.26.1.patents
- Article
14
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2015, v. 22, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.2979/indjglolegstu.22.1.149
- Article
15
- Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 2025, v. 21, n. 2, p. 121
- Article
16
- Historia i Polityka, 2022, v. 41, n. 48, p. 69, doi. 10.12775/HiP.2022.023
- Article
17
- Journal of Contemporary China, 2012, v. 21, n. 73, p. 113, doi. 10.1080/10670564.2012.627669
- Shie, VincentH.;
- Meer, CraigD.;
- Shin, Nian-Feng
- Article
18
- George Washington Law Review, 2024, v. 92, n. 4, p. 811
- Lemley, Mark A.;
- McKenna, Mark P.
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1079
- Article
20
- George Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 1, p. 287
- Article
21
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 645
- Article
22
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 2, p. 480
- Article
23
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 498
- Article
24
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1174
- Article
25
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1065
- Article
26
- FICC Quarterly, 2000, v. 50, n. 3, p. 257
- Article
27
- International Economic Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 4, p. 1877, doi. 10.1111/iere.12338
- Article
28
- International Economic Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.1111/iere.12096
- Mitchell, Matthew;
- Zhang, Yuzhe
- Article
29
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2012, v. 22, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
30
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2007, v. 17, n. 2, p. 377
- Article
31
- Mathematics (2227-7390), 2020, v. 8, n. 8, p. 1263, doi. 10.3390/math8081263
- Chang, Chih-Yao;
- Lin, Kuo-Ping
- Article
32
- Planning News (1329-2862), 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 17
- Article
33
- Science & Public Policy (SPP), 2023, v. 50, n. 2, p. 275, doi. 10.1093/scipol/scac069
- Article
34
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2020, v. 50, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1007/s10657-020-09651-9
- Zingg, Raphael;
- Elsner, Erasmus
- Article
35
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2019, v. 47, n. 3, p. 377, doi. 10.1007/s10657-019-09617-6
- Article
36
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2018, v. 45, n. 3, p. 397, doi. 10.1007/s10657-017-9571-6
- Bueren, Eckart;
- Smuda, Florian
- Article
37
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 243, doi. 10.1007/s10657-011-9279-y
- Hylton, Keith;
- Cho, Sungjoon
- Article
38
- Seybold Report: Analyzing Publishing Technologies, 2001, v. 1, n. 6, p. 24
- Article
39
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2024, v. 14, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
40
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2022, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1
- TU, S. SEAN;
- DUAN, CHARLES
- Article
41
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2017, v. 7, n. 1, p. 51
- RYAN JR., CHRISTOPHER J.;
- FRYE, BRIAN L.
- Article
42
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2015, v. 4, n. 2, p. 358
- SCHULTZ, JASON M.;
- LOVE, BRIAN J.
- Article
43
- GM Crops & Food, 2013, v. 4, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.4161/gmcr.26251
- Article
44
- Geospatial Solutions, 2003, v. 13, n. 3, p. 16
- Article
45
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 5, p. 1661
- Article
46
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2006, v. 2006, n. 6, p. 1517
- Article
47
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2004, v. 2004, n. 1, p. 209
- Article
48
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1998, v. 1998, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
49
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2022, v. 21, n. 1, p. 167
- Article
50
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2012, v. 10, n. 1, p. 163
- Article