Works matching Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
1
- Ratio Juris, 2013, v. 26, n. 4, p. 560, doi. 10.1111/raju.12025
- Article
3
- Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu, 2013, v. 50, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
4
- Social Theory & Practice, 1996, v. 22, n. 3, p. 315
- Article
6
- Health Care Analysis, 2008, v. 16, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1007/s10728-007-0052-x
- Article
8
- Hypatia, 1999, v. 14, n. 2, p. 26, doi. 10.2979/HYP.1999.14.2.26
- Article
9
- Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 2014, v. 62, n. 3, p. 87, doi. 10.5937/analipfb1403087z
- Article
10
- Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 2013, v. 61, n. 2, p. 166
- Article
12
- Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC, 2023, v. 18, n. 1, p. 314, doi. 10.46560/meritum.v18i1.9327
- PAIVA PESSANHA, DIOGO;
- DOS SANTOS CORVAL, PAULO ROBERTO
- Article
13
- Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 77
- Muzzi Filho, Carlos Victor
- Article
14
- Religions, 2015, v. 6, n. 3, p. 839, doi. 10.3390/rel6030839
- Article
15
- 2007
- Nobles, Richard;
- Schiff, David
- Book Review
16
- Philosophical Investigations, 2008, v. 31, n. 2, p. 105, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2007.00337.x
- Article
17
- Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 1997, v. 38, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
18
- Co-herencia, 2022, v. 19, n. 36, p. 337, doi. 10.17230/co-herencia.19.36.13
- Article
19
- Alternative Law Journal, 2019, v. 44, n. 4, p. 286, doi. 10.1177/1037969X19875825
- Article
20
- Metaphilosophy, 2013, v. 44, n. 4, p. 470, doi. 10.1111/meta.12042
- Article
25
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1321
- Article
30
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1201
- Article
33
- Economy & Society, 2005, v. 34, n. 3, p. 451, doi. 10.1080/03085140500111915
- Article
34
- Albany Law Review, 2017, v. 81, n. 1, p. 299
- Article
35
- Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2010, v. 31, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1080/15544770903504875
- Article
36
- 2016
- LEIB, ETHAN J.;
- GALOOB, STEPHEN R.
- Essay
38
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1689
- Article
39
- Deakin Law Review, 2007, v. 12, n. 1, p. 167, doi. 10.21153/dlr2007vol12no1art170
- Article
40
- Social Science Journal, 1998, v. 35, n. 3, p. 333, doi. 10.1016/S0362-3319(98)90003-9
- Article
42
- Philosophical Quarterly, 1994, v. 44, n. 175, p. 233, doi. 10.2307/2219744
- Article
44
- Philosophical Quarterly, 1979, v. 29, n. 114, p. 25, doi. 10.2307/2219180
- Article
46
- Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 2012, v. 37, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1093/jmp/jhr055
- Article
47
- Hastings Center Report, 1995, v. 25, n. 6, p. 32, doi. 10.2307/3527839
- Article
48
- Essays in Literature, 1989, v. 16, n. 2, p. 281
- Article