Expert-Type Content Validity Applications to Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.

Wolf, Zane Robinson

Background: Developing rigorous doctor of nursing practice (DNP) projects continues to challenge faculty and doctoral students. To address project rigor, expert content validity methods have been applied to clinical projects. Students implement expert content validity processes to literature-based project components. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to describe some of the developmental phases of DNP projects during the courses of one DNP program and to explore one strategy for increasing the rigor of DNP projects, review details on expert-type content validity methods, and examine literature for projects implementing an alternate application of expert-type content validity and scoring approaches to components of DNP projects. Methods: Expert content validity methods are described for DNP projects, such as guidelines, teaching plans, support groups, and algorithms. They are used to judge components generated from initial content analysis strategies. Types of expert panelists and descriptions of scoring ranks on project components are presented to represent different expert content validity strategies. Results The steps are presented to support expert content validity processes. Conclusions: DNP projects challenge faculty and students to create systematically constructed quality improvement projects on important and interesting clinical problems. The expert context validity process is one approach of enhancing project rigor. Implications for Nursing: An outline offers steps to establish expert content validity for translational DNP projects.

NURSES; SUPPORT groups; GRADUATE nursing education; OCCUPATIONAL roles; RESEARCH evaluation; DOCTORAL students; DOCTORAL programs; CONTENT analysis; EDUCATORS; NURSING practice; EXPERTISE; QUALITY assurance; NURSING students; ALGORITHMS

Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice, 2024, Vol 17, Issue 1, p54

2380-9418

Academic Journal

10.1891/JDNP-2022-0010