We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Photosynthetic physiological characteristics, growth performance, and element concentrations reveal the calcicole–calcifuge behaviors of three Camellia species.
- Authors
Shengfeng Chai; Haidu Jiang; Yishan Yang; Xinfeng Pan; Rong Zou; Jianmin Tang; Zongyou Chen; Danjuan Zeng; Xiao Wei
- Abstract
We grew three yellow Camellia species (the calcifuge C. nitidissima and C. tunghinensis, and the calcicole C. pubipetala) in acidic and calcareous soils for 7 months and assessed their photosynthetic physiological characteristics, growth performance, and element concentrations in this developmental context. The calcifuge C. nitidissima and C. tunghinensis species exhibited poor growth with leaf chlorosis, growth stagnation, and root disintegration in calcareous soils, and with their Pn, Gs, Tr, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, ETR, qP, leaf Chla, Chlb, and Chl(a b) concentrations, and root, stem, leaf, and total biomass being significantly lower when grown in calcareous soils relative to in acidic soils. In contrast, the calcicole C. pubipetala grew well in both acidic and calcareous soils, with few differences in the above parameters between these two soil substrates. The absorption and/or transportation of nutrient elements such as N, K, Ca, Mg, and Fe by the two calcifuge Camellia species plants grown in calcareous soils were restrained. Soil type plays a major role in the failure of the two calcifuge Camellia species to establish themselves in calcareous soils, whereas other factors such as competition and human activity are likely more important limiting factors in the reverse case. This study furthers our understanding of the factors influencing the distribution of these rare and endangered yellow Camellia species, allowing for improved management of these species in conservation projects and horticultural production.
- Publication
Open Life Sciences, 2024, Vol 19, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
2391-5412
- Publication type
Academic Journal
- DOI
10.1515/biol-2022-0835