We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Evaluation of systems reform in public hospitals, Victoria, Australia, to improve access to antenatal care for women of refugee background: An interrupted time series design.
- Authors
Yelland, Jane; Mensah, Fiona; Riggs, Elisha; McDonald, Ellie; Szwarc, Josef; Dawson, Wendy; Vanpraag, Dannielle; Casey, Sue; East, Christine; Biro, Mary Anne; Teale, Glyn; Willey, Sue; Brown, Stephanie J.
- Abstract
Introduction: Inequalities in maternal and newborn health persist in many high-income countries, including for women of refugee background. The Bridging the Gap partnership programme in Victoria, Australia, was designed to find new ways to improve the responsiveness of universal maternity and early child health services for women and families of refugee background with the codesign and implementation of iterative quality improvement and demonstration initiatives. One goal of this 'whole-of-system' approach was to improve access to antenatal care. The objective of this paper is to report refugee women's access to hospital-based antenatal care over the period of health system reforms. Methods and findings: The study was designed using an interrupted time series analysis using routinely collected data from two hospital networks (four maternity hospitals) at 6-month intervals during reform activity (January 2014 to December 2016). The sample included women of refugee background and a comparison group of Australian-born women giving birth over the 3 years. We describe the proportions of women of refugee background (1) attending seven or more antenatal visits and (2) attending their first hospital visit at less than 16 weeks' gestation compared over time and to Australian-born women using logistic regression analyses. In total, 10% of births at participating hospitals were to women of refugee background. Refugee women were born in over 35 countries, and at one participating hospital, 40% required an interpreter. Compared with Australian-born women, women of refugee background were of similar age at the time of birth and were more likely to be having their second or subsequent baby and have four or more children. At baseline, 60% of refugee-background women and Australian-born women attended seven or more antenatal visits. Similar trends of improvement over the 6-month time intervals were observed for both populations, increasing to 80% of women at one hospital network having seven or more visits at the final data collection period and 73% at the other network. In contrast, there was a steady decrease in the proportion of women having their first hospital visit at less than 16 weeks' gestation, which was most marked for women of refugee background. Using an interrupted time series of observational data over the period of improvement is limited compared with using a randomisation design, which was not feasible in this setting. Conclusions: Accurate ascertainment of 'harder-to-reach' populations and ongoing monitoring of quality improvement initiatives are essential to understand the impact of system reforms. Our findings suggest that improvement in total antenatal visits may have been at the expense of recommended access to public hospital antenatal care within 16 weeks of gestation. Jane Yelland and colleagues report refugee women's access to antenatal services in Australia during a period of health systems reform. Author summary: Why was the study done?: Women of refugee background have rates of stillbirth and perinatal mortality two to three times higher than Australian-born women. Antenatal care is a key preventive strategy for the optimal health of pregnant women and newborn babies and is critical to addressing modifiable factors for poor health outcomes. Refugee women experience barriers in accessing and engaging in antenatal care, and healthcare providers report challenges in responding to the social context and needs of refugee families. What did the researchers do and find?: We codesigned and implemented multiple quality improvement and demonstration initiatives in universal health services, including four maternity hospitals. We used an interrupted time series design to assess the timing and number of antenatal clinical visits for refugee women compared with Australian-born women over 3 years of reform. Applying a method devised by the partnership, we identified from routinely collected data that 10% of all women giving birth at the participating hospitals were of refugee background. There was an increase over time in the proportion of refugee and Australian-born women attending the standard number of visits, with women of refugee background commencing hospital antenatal care well past the recommended gestation. What do these findings mean?: For women of refugee background, delayed access to hospital-based care increases the likelihood of missing out on critical elements of pregnancy care vital to optimising maternal and child outcomes. Accurate ascertainment of this 'harder-to-reach' population is essential to evaluating the impact of quality improvement initiatives on refugee families' access to healthcare. An interrupted time series design with a comparison group is suited to measuring change in number and timing of antenatal visits, although data quality, contextual influences, and qualitative insights into system change are important for interpreting outcomes. Ongoing monitoring of quality improvement initiatives on populations vulnerable to poor health outcomes is essential to understand the impact of system reforms and efforts to reduce inequalities.
- Subjects
VICTORIA; WOMEN refugees; PRENATAL care; PUBLIC hospitals; HEALTH care reform; CHILD health services; WOMEN'S hospitals
- Publication
PLoS Medicine, 2020, Vol 17, Issue 7, p1
- ISSN
1549-1277
- Publication type
Academic Journal
- DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003089