Works matching Attitudes of U.S. Supreme Court justices
1
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. v, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0010
- Article
2
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 371
- Article
3
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
4
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 179
- Article
5
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1007
- Article
7
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1705
- Article
8
- Public Choice, 2015, v. 163, n. 1/2, p. 167, doi. 10.1007/s11127-014-0216-9
- Article
9
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1339
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 667
- Article
13
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 2022, v. 108, n. 4, p. 418, doi. 10.1080/00335630.2022.2131215
- Article
14
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 30, n. 3, p. 293
- Unah, Isaac;
- Rosano, Kristen;
- Milam, K. Dawn
- Article
15
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 4, p. 793
- BALLINGRUD, GORDON;
- JAMMO, CAITLEIN
- Article
16
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 809
- Article
17
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2019, v. 47, p. 59, doi. 10.1177/1073110519857319
- Article
18
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2024, v. 49, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1353/sch.2024.a920394
- Article
19
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2024, v. 49, n. 1, p. 49, doi. 10.1353/sch.2024.a920393
- Article
20
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 2, p. 171, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0012
- Fife, Madelyn;
- Goelzhauser, Greg;
- Hodgson, Kaylee B.;
- Vouvalis, Nicole
- Article
21
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 2, p. 193, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0013
- Article
22
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0024
- Article
23
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0005
- Article
24
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 231, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0000
- Article
25
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 249, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0001
- Article
27
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 188, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0016
- Article
28
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0017
- Article
29
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 103, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0011
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 5, p. 1101
- Article
32
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
33
- Communication Law & Policy, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 385, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2012.717493
- Silver, Derigan;
- Kozlowski, Dan V.
- Article
34
- Communication Law & Policy, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2012.717491
- Article
36
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 717
- Article
37
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 689
- Article
41
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 88, n. 9, p. 30
- Article
42
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 4, p. 817
- Bennett, Thomas B.;
- Friedman, Barry;
- Martin, Andrew D.;
- Smelcer, Susan Navarro
- Article
44
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
45
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
46
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1665
- Article
48
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1052
- Article
50
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1349
- Iuliano, Jason;
- Ya Sheng Lin
- Article