Works matching Attitudes of U.S. Supreme Court justices
1
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. v, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0010
- Article
2
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
3
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 371
- Article
4
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
5
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 74, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
7
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1705
- Article
8
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2020, v. 26, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.26.1.predicting
- Article
9
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
10
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 4, p. 817
- Bennett, Thomas B.;
- Friedman, Barry;
- Martin, Andrew D.;
- Smelcer, Susan Navarro
- Article
12
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
14
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1339
- Article
15
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 667
- Article
16
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 2022, v. 108, n. 4, p. 418, doi. 10.1080/00335630.2022.2131215
- Article
17
- Political Research Quarterly, 2021, v. 74, n. 4, p. 795, doi. 10.1177/1065912920948138
- Black, Ryan C.;
- Owens, Ryan J.
- Article
18
- Political Research Quarterly, 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 257, doi. 10.1177/1065912916688112
- Khun, James;
- Hall, Matthew E. K.;
- Macher, Kristen
- Article
19
- Political Research Quarterly, 2011, v. 64, n. 4, p. 765, doi. 10.1177/1065912910388185
- Black, Ryan C.;
- Owens, Ryan J.
- Article
20
- Labor Law Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 3, p. 149
- Article
21
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 6, p. 2397
- Smith, Robert J.;
- Sarma, Bidish J.;
- Cull, Sophie
- Article
22
- Capital University Law Review, 2017, v. 45, n. 3, p. 457
- SMITH, CHRISTOPHER E.;
- PETLAKH, KSENIA
- Article
23
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
24
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
25
- Public Choice, 2015, v. 163, n. 1/2, p. 167, doi. 10.1007/s11127-014-0216-9
- Article
26
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 457
- Article
27
- Southern California Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 2, p. 205
- Article
28
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
29
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 231, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0000
- Article
31
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0005
- Article
32
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 249, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0001
- Article
33
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 188, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0016
- Article
34
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0017
- Article
35
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 103, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0011
- Article
36
- Columbia Law Review, 2022, v. 122, n. 4, p. 90
- Article
38
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 689
- Article
39
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 717
- Article
41
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 4, p. 871
- Article
42
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1665
- Article
43
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
44
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 221
- SAWYER III, LOGAN EVERETT
- Article
45
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 197
- Article
46
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
47
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 4, p. 793
- BALLINGRUD, GORDON;
- JAMMO, CAITLEIN
- Article
48
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 809
- Article
49
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1331
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 3, p. 971
- Article