A szakértői bizonyítás hatékonyságának növelése -- egy empirikus kutatás nyomán.
- Published in:
- Belügyi Szemle / Academic Journal of Internal Affairs, 2023, v. 71, n. 10, p. 1773, doi. 10.38146/BSZ.2023.10.6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Expert evidence
Results: 5000
1
2
Miscarriages of justice and expert psychiatric evidence: lessons from criminal appeals in England and Wales.
- Published in:
- BJPsych Advances, 2019, v. 25, n. 4, p. 251, doi. 10.1192/bja.2019.11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
In Australia the jury decides:the reliability and validity of expert evidence: a perspective from forensic pathology.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, v. 52, n. 3, p. 249, doi. 10.1080/00450618.2020.1729414
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Expert evidence: dangers and the enhancement of reasoning.
- Published in:
- BJPsych Advances, 2024, v. 30, n. 6, p. 338, doi. 10.1192/bja.2024.18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Evaluating the Correctness of Evidence Theses Ordering an Expert Opinion from a Valuer in Compensation Proceedings Reagrding RUAs.
- Published in:
- World of Real Estate Journal / Swiat Nieruchomosci, 2020, v. 114, p. 80, doi. 10.14659/WOREJ.220.114.04
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Malawi: A Call for Reliability Safeguards.
- Published in:
- Journal of African Law, 2023, v. 67, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.1017/S0021855322000262
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Differences in actual persuasiveness between experiential and professional expert evidence.
- Published in:
- Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2012, v. 1, n. 2, p. 194, doi. 10.1075/jaic.1.2.03deg
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
No More Laissez Faire? Expert Evidence, Rule Changes and Reliability.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2016, v. 80, n. 5, p. 327, doi. 10.1177/0022018316670967
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2016, v. 80, n. 5, p. 344, doi. 10.1177/0022018316668448
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The Reliability of Expert Evidence: Reflections on the Law Commission's Proposals for Reform.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2009, v. 73, n. 6, p. 488, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2009.73.6.603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Counterintuitive Expert Psychological Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Trials in New Zealand.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 4, p. 511, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2013.839930
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
İngiliz Hukukunda Uzman Delili.
- Published in:
- Antalya Bilim University Law Review, 2020, v. 8, n. 15, p. 105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Explaining and trusting expert evidence: What is a 'sufficiently reliable scientific basis'?
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2020, v. 24, n. 3, p. 233, doi. 10.1177/1365712720927622
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Due process and the admission of expert evidence on recovered memory in historic child sexual abuse cases: lessons from America.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2012, v. 16, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.392
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Usurping the role of the jury? Expert evidence and witness credibility in English criminal trials.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2009, v. 13, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2009.13.2.314
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The Standards in Admitting Expert Evidence in Ethiopia: Some Practical Discrepancies.
- Published in:
- Mizan Law Review, 2017, v. 11, n. 1, p. 239, doi. 10.4314/mlr.v11i1.9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Comprehension problems that jurors encounter with expert evidence in online child pornography trials.
- Published in:
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2023, v. 35, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1080/10345329.2022.2163752
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
LA PRUEBA PERICIAL EN LOS DELITOS ECONÓMICOS. DE LA PERICIAL CONTABLE AL PERITO DE COMPLIANCE.
- Published in:
- Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, 2020, v. 40, p. 689, doi. 10.15304/epc.40.6192
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
La prueba pericial en el proceso penal colombiano desde la dimensión social de la epistemología.
- Published in:
- Estudios de Derecho, 2015, v. 72, n. 160, p. 51, doi. 10.17533/udea.esde.v72n160a03
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Misinterpretation of expert evidence in Wood v R.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014, v. 46, n. 4, p. 368, doi. 10.1080/00450618.2013.879207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Trust me - I'm an expert: forensic evidence and witness immunity.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2009, v. 41, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.1080/00450610903007038
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Expert Evidence About Violence Risk Assessment: A Study of Canadian Legal Decisions.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2013, v. 12, n. 4, p. 287, doi. 10.1080/14999013.2013.867383
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Self-Defence and the Reliability of Expert Evidence: R v Mazzer [2024] EWCA Crim 557.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2024, v. 88, n. 5/6, p. 398, doi. 10.1177/00220183241292460
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Expert Evidence Reliability; Time to Grasp the Nettle.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2011, v. 75, n. 5, p. 368, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2011.75.5.726
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Expert Evidence and Jurors’ Views on Expert Witnesses.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2015, v. 22, n. 5, p. 673, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2015.1063181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Expert Evidence in the Queensland Mental Health Court.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2009, v. 16, p. 13, doi. 10.1080/13218710902762678
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 4, p. 228, doi. 10.1177/1365712715591471
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Expert witness evidence in sexual assault trials: questions, answers and law reform in Australia and England.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2013, v. 17, n. 1, p. 74, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2013.17.1.419
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Expert evidence: problems and safeguards.
- Published in:
- Construction Management & Economics, 2007, v. 25, n. 7, p. 785, doi. 10.1080/01446190701499583
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Pre-recorded expert evidence in intimate partner violence cases.
- Published in:
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2020, v. 32, n. 4, p. 458, doi. 10.1080/10345329.2020.1830505
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Retrospective bias in expert evidence: Effects on patient and doctor safety.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Other
32
Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemology” in Medicine and Law: Parallels between Legal Reforms to the Admissibility of Expert Evidence and Evidence-Based Medicine.
- Published in:
- Social Epistemology, 2008, v. 22, n. 4, p. 405, doi. 10.1080/02691720802559420
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Modeling the Construct of an Expert Evidence-Adaptive Knowledge Base for a Pressure Injury Clinical Decision Support System.
- Published in:
- Informatics, 2017, v. 4, n. 3, p. 20, doi. 10.3390/informatics4030020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Expert Evidence, Hearsay and Victims of Trafficking: R v Brecani [2021] EWCA Crim 731.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2021, v. 85, n. 6, p. 471, doi. 10.1177/00220183211050226
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
The admissibility of expert evidence in the context of an amended Part 33: R v H [2014] EWCA Crim 1555.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 78, n. 6, p. 457, doi. 10.1177/0022018314557415a
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, Expert Evidence and the Unreliability of Admissions during Police Interviews.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
37
Expert Evidence About Memory.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2008, v. 15, n. 3, p. 362, doi. 10.1080/13218710802464094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Técnicas neurocientíficas como medio de prueba pericial.
- Published in:
- Prolegómenos Derechos y Valores, 2019, v. 22, n. 44, p. 143, doi. 10.18359/prole.4160
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
From ad hoc to hybrid-the rules and regulations governing reception of expert evidence at the International Criminal Court.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.339
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
THE PREJUDICES OF EXPERT EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Monash University Law Review, 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Of Evidence and Experts: Recent Developments in Fact-finding and Expert Evidence in Judicial Review.
- Published in:
- Judicial Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 4, p. 243, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2019.1579531
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Public Health, 2005, v. 95, p. 137, doi. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044677
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Consultation Document: Bearing Good Witness - Proposals for Reforming the Delivery of Medical Expert Evidence in Family Law Cases.
- Published in:
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2007, v. 29, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1080/09649060701666630
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
BACK TO BURGESS: THE IMPACT OF THE WHITE BURGESS EXPERT EVIDENCE REGIME IN ALBERTA DECISIONS.
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2019, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29173/alr2562
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Administrarea probei cu expertiză prin comisie rogatorie. Măsurile procesuale care pot fi dispuse de instanța rogantă și de instanța rogată. Nelegala pronunțare de către instanța rogantă a decăderii părții din dreptul de a administra proba cu expertiză, pentru neconsemnarea sumei reprezentând onorariul de expert, fapt ce atrage sancțiunea nulității încheierii de ședință, precum și a actelor de procedură ulterioare care nu pot avea o existență de sine stătătoare
- Published in:
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2022, n. 4, p. 80
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Partid politic. Respingerea încuviinŧării probei cu expertiză. Respectarea dispoziŧiilor art. 6 din Convenŧia pentru apărarea drepturilor omului şi a libertăŧilor fundamentale. Aprecierea similarităŧii semnului politic de către instanŧa de judecată.
- Published in:
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2020, n. 2, p. 61
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Partid politic. Respingerea încuviințării probei cu expertiză. Respectarea dispozițiilor art. 6 din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale. Aprecierea similarității semnului politic de către instanța de judecată.
- Published in:
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2020, n. 1, p. 61
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Expert evidence, damages and costs: a DIFC case law update.
- Published in:
- Construction Law International, 2024, v. 19, n. 3, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Can experts help jurors to evaluate eyewitness evidence? A review of eyewitness expert effects.
- Published in:
- Legal & Criminological Psychology, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1348/135532509X477225
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Expert evidence: difficulties and solutions in prosecutions for infant harm.
- Published in:
- Legal Studies, 2010, v. 30, n. 2, p. 279, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00154.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article