Works matching DE "SEX discrimination in employment laws"
1
- Transgender Tapestry, 2007, n. 113, p. 61
- Article
2
- Transgender Tapestry, 2007, n. 113, p. 57
- Article
3
- Journal of Corporation Law, 1987, v. 12, n. 3, p. 620
- Article
4
- Journal of Corporation Law, 1987, v. 12, n. 3, p. 619
- Article
5
- International Labour Review, 1999, v. 138, n. 4, p. 381, doi. 10.1111/j.1564-913X.1999.tb00394.x
- Article
6
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
7
- Gender & Education, 1990, v. 2, n. 3, p. 297, doi. 10.1080/0954025900020304
- Article
8
- California Law Review, 2016, v. 104, n. 2, p. 591, doi. 10.15779/Z38M27W
- Article
9
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 343
- Article
10
- Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 349
- Article
11
- Southern Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 1, p. 29
- PATTISON, PATRICIA;
- SANDERS, DONALD E.;
- ROSS, JOHN
- Article
12
- Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu, 2009, v. 52, p. 125
- Gradaščević-Sijerčić, Jasminka
- Article
13
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 885
- Article
14
- San Diego Law Review, 2013, v. 50, n. 1, p. 191
- Article
15
- San Diego Law Review, 2006, v. 43, n. 4, p. 857
- Article
16
- Journal of Social Issues, 2004, v. 60, n. 4, p. 835, doi. 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00389.x
- Article
17
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 14
- Article
18
- Labor: Studies in Working Class History of the Americas, 2014, v. 11, n. 3, p. 43, doi. 10.1215/15476715-2687646
- Article
19
- Compensation & Benefits Review, 2000, v. 32, n. 5, p. 17, doi. 10.1177/08863680022097993
- Article
20
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2008, v. 1, n. 2, p. 260, doi. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00044.x
- Cozma, Irina;
- Woehr, David
- Article
21
- California Western Law Review, 2009, v. 46, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
22
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
23
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 2, n. 2, p. 154
- Article
24
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 751
- Article
25
- Alabama Law Review, 2021, v. 72, n. 3, p. 641
- Article
26
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 8, p. 32
- Article
27
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 98, n. 5, p. 1943
- Article
28
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 127, n. 2, p. 322
- Article
29
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 124, n. 2, p. 396
- Article
30
- 2013
- AYRES, IAN;
- LUEDEMAN, RICHARD
- Essay
31
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 4, p. 893
- Article
32
- Indiana Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 817
- Article
33
- SMU Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
35
- TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 2015, v. 52, n. 4, p. 89
- Article
36
- George Washington International Law Review, 2018, v. 50, n. 2, p. 389
- Article
37
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2006, v. 26, n. 3, p. 199, doi. 10.1177/0734371X05278404
- Article
38
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1997, v. 17, n. 2, p. 57, doi. 10.1177/0734371X9701700205
- Lee Jr., Robert D.;
- Greenlaw, Paul S.
- Article
39
- Journal of Law & Education, 2017, v. 46, n. 1, p. 129
- Article
41
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 713
- Article
43
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 1181
- Article
45
- Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution, 2014, v. 22, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
47
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 67, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
49
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 205, doi. 10.1007/s10691-021-09458-2
- Gutiérrez-Solana Journoud, Ander
- Article
50
- California Law Review, 1995, v. 83, n. 5, p. 1151, doi. 10.2307/3480877
- Article