Fracture resistances of heat-treated nickel-titanium files used for minimally invasive instrumentation.

Kang, Yoo Jung; Kwak, Sang Won; Ha, Jung-Hong; Gambarini, Gianluca; Kim, Hyeon-Cheol

Background: This study compared the torsional resistance, bending stiffness, and cyclic fatigue resistances of different heat-treated NiTi files for minimally invasive instrumentation. Methods: TruNatomy (TN) and EndoRoad (ER) file systems were compared with ProTaper Gold (PG). Torsional load, distortion angle, and bending stiffness were assessed using a custom device AEndoS, and toughness was calculated using the torsional data. Cyclic fatigue resistance was evaluated using another custom device (EndoC) with 45-degree curved canal in which file was rotated until fracture using dynamic pecking motion at 37 °C. One-way analysis of variance and Duncan's post-hoc comparison were conducted at a significance level of 95%. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed fracture features and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyzed phase transformation temperatures. Results: ER and TN showed significantly lower torsional strength than PG (p < 0.05). However, ER showed a significantly greater distortion angle and the highest toughness, followed by PG and TN (p < 0.05). Both ER and TN showed similar bending stiffness, which was lower bending stiffness than PG (p < 0.05). ER showed the highest cyclic fatigue resistance (p < 0.05). SEM revealed typical fracture features across all groups, with distinct milling grooves in PG and TN, not in ER. DSC indicated that PG and ER showed a peak of austenite (Ap) at temperatures higher than body temperature, 42 °C and 40 °C, respectively, while TN showed A p at 25 °C. Conclusion: Files for minimally invasive instrumentations typically exhibited high cyclic fatigue resistance but showed differences in the properties. The selection should depend on the root canal and tooth condition.

DENTAL equipment; MATERIALS testing; TITANIUM; PRODUCT design; ELECTRON microscopy; MINIMALLY invasive procedures; NICKEL; HEAT; BODY temperature; ROOT canal treatment; MEDICAL equipment reliability

BMC Oral Health, 2025, Vol 25, Issue 1, p1

1472-6831

Academic Journal

10.1186/s12903-025-05487-4