Comparison of the pull-out force of different microtube-based methods in fractured endodontic instrument removal: An in-vitro study.

Hashemi, Nasim; Aminsobhani, Mohsen; Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad; Hamidzadeh, Fatemeh; Sarraf, Pegah

Background: The fracture of an endodontic instrument within the root canal system can occur during root canal therapy, complicating thorough cleaning and shaping. Consequently, managing the broken fragment becomes crucial. Methods: Eighty Nickel-titanium (NiTi) #20 K-files (Mani, Tochigi, Japan) were cut 8 mm from the tip, fixed into a corkboard, and classified into five groups (n = 14 each). The microtube-based methods included: microtube with cyanoacrylate glue (group 1), light-cured flowable composite resin (group 2), wire (group 3), internal shaft (group 4), and laser (group 5). Each method grasped the separated instrument's free end above the corkboard, and a pull-out test was performed using a universal testing machine(UTM). Additionally, 10 samples were separated in extracted canine root canals, and the temperature of the outer surface of the root was measured using the microtube and laser methods. Results: Groups 1 and 4 exhibited significantly greater pull-out force compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Groups 2 and 5 demonstrated significantly lower pull-out forces (p < 0.001). In Group 5, the temperature increase was 11 °C on the tube surface and 3 °C on the root surface. Conclusion: All microtube-based techniques are effective for fractured instrument removal, with cyanoacrylate glue and laser methods being particularly suitable for cases that require higher force.

ENDODONTICS; DENTAL equipment; DENTAL bonding; CUSPIDS; IN vitro studies; RESEARCH funding; TITANIUM; DENTAL materials; MEDICAL device removal; LASER therapy; ROOT canal treatment; ADHESIVES; TENSILE strength; MEDICAL equipment reliability; TOOTH fractures; COMPARATIVE studies; TEMPERATURE

BMC Oral Health, 2025, Vol 25, Issue 1, p1

1472-6831

Academic Journal

10.1186/s12903-024-05370-8