Works matching DE "CONGRESSIONAL apportionment"
1
- Population & Development Review, 2019, v. 45, n. 2, p. 379, doi. 10.1111/padr.12230
- Baumle, Amanda K.;
- Poston, Dudley L.
- Article
2
- RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2025, v. 11, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.02
- NEIDERT, LISA;
- FARLEY, REYNOLDS;
- MORENOFF, JEFFREY
- Article
3
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 3, p. 987, doi. 10.15779/Z383X83M57
- Article
4
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 917
- Article
5
- American Journal of Political Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 2009, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1006, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00413.x
- Hayes, Danny;
- McKee, Seth C.
- Article
6
- American Journal of Political Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 1989, v. 33, n. 3, p. 653, doi. 10.2307/2111067
- Article
7
- Alabama Lawyer, 2021, v. 82, n. 6, p. 436
- Lathram, Othni J.;
- Entrekin Jr., James L.
- Article
9
- Public Choice, 2022, v. 192, n. 1/2, p. 115, doi. 10.1007/s11127-022-00974-6
- Dougherty, Keith L.;
- Pittman, Grace
- Article
10
- Public Choice, 2013, v. 157, n. 1/2, p. 333, doi. 10.1007/s11127-012-9947-7
- Article
11
- Public Choice, 2013, v. 157, n. 1/2, p. 207, doi. 10.1007/s11127-012-9938-8
- Article
12
- Forum (2194-6183), 2010, v. 8, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.2202/1540-8884.1394
- Article
13
- Social Problems, 2018, v. 65, n. 3, p. 285, doi. 10.1093/socpro/spx018
- Article
14
- Management Science, 2025, v. 71, n. 2, p. 1464, doi. 10.1287/mnsc.2023.02472
- Article
15
- Denver Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
16
- Journal of Social Issues, 2008, v. 64, n. 3, p. 619, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00580.x
- Ergun, Damla;
- Deason, Grace;
- Borgida, Eugene;
- Charles, Guy‐Uriel
- Article
17
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 341
- PRAKASH, SAIKRISHNA BANGALORE;
- YOO, JOHN
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
19
- Politics & Governance, 2014, v. 2, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.17645/pag.v2i1.18
- Ladewig, Jeffrey W.;
- McKee, Seth C.
- Article
20
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2016, v. 10, n. 1, p. 208
- Article
21
- Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 2011, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1080/02606755.2011.560752
- Article
22
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 319
- ANDERSON, COURTNEY LAUREN
- Article
23
- Boston Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 4, p. 5
- Article
24
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2021, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2432, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.13058
- Cervas, Jonathan;
- Grofman, Bernard
- Article
25
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2020, v. 101, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.12742
- Article
26
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2015, v. 96, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.12130
- Lawrence, Christopher N.;
- Huffmon, Scott H.
- Article
27
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2010, v. 91, n. 2, p. 344, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00696.x
- Hood, M. V.;
- McKee, Seth C.
- Article
28
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2004, v. 85, n. 3, p. 578, doi. 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00234.x
- Baumle, Amanda K.;
- Poston, Dudley L.
- Article
29
- New York University Law Review, 2021, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1021
- HERENSTEIN, ETHAN;
- RUDENSKY, YURIJ
- Article
30
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 238
- Article
31
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 323
- Article
32
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1057
- Article
33
- American Journal of Legal History, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 277, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/51.2.277
- Article
34
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 979
- Article
35
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 485
- Charles, Guy-Uriel E.;
- Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis
- Article
36
- Alabama Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 1, p. 203
- Article
37
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 387, doi. 10.2307/1190240
- Article
38
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 377, doi. 10.2307/1190239
- Article
39
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 314, doi. 10.2307/1190236
- Article
40
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 338, doi. 10.2307/1190237
- FARRELLY, DAVID G.;
- HINDERAKER, IVAN
- Article
41
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 302, doi. 10.2307/1190235
- SCHMECKEBIER, LAURENCE F.
- Article
42
- 1952
- HINDERAKER, IVAN;
- WATERS, LAUGHLIN E.
- Case Study
43
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 417, doi. 10.2307/1190241
- Article
44
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 364, doi. 10.2307/1190238
- Article
45
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 290, doi. 10.2307/1190234
- Article
46
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 268, doi. 10.2307/1190232
- Article
47
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1952, v. 17, n. 2, p. 253
- Article
48
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2021, v. 47, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
49
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2013, v. 43, n. 3, p. 392, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjt023
- Article
50
- Political Research Quarterly, 2024, v. 77, n. 4, p. 1431, doi. 10.1177/10659129241279084
- Article