Works matching Civil restitution
1
- Maine Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
2
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2014, v. 18, n. 3, p. 801
- Article
3
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 605
- Article
4
- Dreptul, 2023, n. 8, p. 41
- Article
5
- Revista de Derecho Privado (0123-4366), 2015, n. 28, p. 129, doi. 10.18601/01234366.n28.05
- OLAVE, RUPERTO PINOCHET;
- MACHUCA, RICARDO CONCHA
- Article
6
- Valahia University Law Study, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 351
- Article
7
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukraini, 2021, n. 5, p. 167, doi. 10.33498/louu-2021-05-167
- Article
8
- Marquette Law Review, 2011, v. 95, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
9
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Advocate (05154987), 2011, v. 54, n. 3/4, p. 21
- Article
11
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2013, v. 18, n. 3, p. 297
- Article
12
- Journal of Corporation Law, 1993, v. 18, n. 3, p. 441
- Article
13
- Romanian Review of Private Law / Revista Română de Drept Privat, 2023, n. 2, p. 270
- Article
14
- Agrekon, 2014, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/03031853.2014.975413
- Article
15
- Social Theory & Practice, 1999, v. 25, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
16
- Journal of Religious Ethics, 2006, v. 34, n. 4, p. 685, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00290.x
- Article
17
- Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 2014, v. 40, n. 12, p. 1574, doi. 10.1177/0146167214551542
- Kuppens, Toon;
- Yzerbyt, Vincent Y.
- Article
18
- Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2018, v. 36, n. 2, p. 99, doi. 10.1002/crq.21234
- Hansen, Toran;
- Umbreit, Mark
- Article
19
- Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought & Culture, 2019, v. 22, n. 2, p. 106, doi. 10.1353/log.2019.0013
- Article
21
- Granular Matter, 2014, v. 16, n. 4, p. 573, doi. 10.1007/s10035-014-0507-3
- Article
22
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2009, v. 27, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1177/016934410902700104
- Article
23
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2009, v. 27, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/016934410902700101
- Article
25
- Polish Journal of Aesthetics, 2020, n. 56, p. 101, doi. 10.19205/56.20.6
- Article
26
- Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 2018, v. 22, p. 377, doi. 10.12775/SIT.2018.020
- Article
27
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1699
- Article
28
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2012, v. 78, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- Journal of Visual Art Practice, 2019, v. 18, n. 4, p. 305, doi. 10.1080/14702029.2019.1676996
- Article
30
- Fidelium Iura, 2003, n. 13, p. 13
- Article
31
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2021, v. 25, n. 2, p. 295, doi. 10.1080/13642987.2020.1773441
- Article
32
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 624, doi. 10.1080/13642980903534360
- Chinwuba, Nwudego Nkemakonam
- Article
33
- Canadian Journal of Latin American & Caribbean Studies (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 2017, v. 42, n. 3, p. 298, doi. 10.1080/08263663.2017.1317951
- Article
34
- Geographical Journal, 2002, v. 168, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1111/1475-4959.00046
- Blacksell, Mark;
- Born, Karl Martin
- Article
35
- Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 2021, v. 69, n. 1, p. 159, doi. 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21106A
- Article
36
- Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 2019, v. 67, n. 1, p. 49, doi. 10.5937/AnaliPFB1901049L
- Article
37
- European Review of History, 2021, v. 28, n. 2, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/13507486.2021.1882950
- Caglioti, Daniela Luigia;
- Brice, Catherine
- Article
38
- European Review of History, 2021, v. 28, n. 2, p. 323, doi. 10.1080/13507486.2021.1885350
- Article
40
- Europe-Asia Studies, 2012, v. 64, n. 4, p. 761, doi. 10.1080/09668136.2012.669940
- Article
41
- Religions, 2020, v. 11, n. 11, p. 620, doi. 10.3390/rel11110620
- Article
42
- Dreptul, 2020, n. 11, p. 79
- Article
43
- Dreptul, 2017, n. 3, p. 168
- Article
44
- Modern Law Review, 2021, v. 84, n. 2, p. 371, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12593
- Article
45
- Modern Law Review, 2018, v. 81, n. 2, p. 222, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12327
- Article
46
- Modern Law Review, 2015, v. 78, n. 2, p. 296, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12116
- Article
47
- Modern Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 3, p. 429, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12020
- Article
50
- Modern Law Review, 2005, v. 68, n. 2, p. 195, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00535.x
- Article