Works matching DE "THERAPEUTIC jurisprudence"
1
- Clinical Law Review, 2006, v. 13, n. 1, p. 605
- Winick, Bruce J.;
- Wexler, David B.
- Article
2
- Clinical Law Review, 2006, v. 13, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
3
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, p. 124
- MARSON, JAMES;
- FERRIS, KATY;
- KAWALEK, ANNA
- Article
4
- Family Court Review, 2023, v. 61, n. 3, p. 510, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12731
- Article
5
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 478, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12589
- Perlin, Michael L.;
- Lynch, Alison J.
- Article
6
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 464, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12588
- Article
7
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 4, p. 769, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12545
- Idrogo, Jasmine Victoria;
- Yelderman, Logan A.;
- Blomquist, Martha‐Elin;
- Broadus, Angela D.
- Article
8
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 4, p. 673, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12601
- Harris‐Britt, April;
- Paces‐Wiles, Diane;
- Wax, Noa
- Article
9
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 4, p. 641, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12599
- Davis, Frank;
- Sexton, Thomas
- Article
10
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 521, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12592
- Article
11
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 508, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12591
- Perlman, Karni;
- Morag, Tamar
- Article
12
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 491, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12590
- Stephens, Tricia N.;
- Katz, Colleen Cary;
- Pisciotta, Caterina;
- Lens, Vicki
- Article
13
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 407, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12584
- Babb, Barbara A.;
- Pruett, Marsha Kline
- Article
14
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 423, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12587
- Article
15
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 444, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12539
- Article
16
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 414, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12586
- Article
17
- Family Court Review, 2021, v. 59, n. 3, p. 409, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12585
- Article
18
- Family Court Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12324
- Perlin, Michael L.;
- Lynch, Alison J.
- Article
19
- Family Court Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 2, p. 177, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12272
- Gal, Tali;
- Schilli‐Jerichower, Dahlia
- Article
20
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, v. 25, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1002/bsl.705
- Diesfeld, Kate;
- Sjöström, Stefan
- Article
23
- Liverpool Law Review, 2024, v. 45, n. 2, p. 235, doi. 10.1007/s10991-023-09354-6
- Kawalek, Anna;
- Rosello, Mercedes
- Article
24
- Liverpool Law Review, 2024, v. 45, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1007/s10991-023-09329-7
- Article
26
- Family Court Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 4, p. 642, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12115
- Article
27
- Family Court Review, 2003, v. 41, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00868.x
- Article
28
- Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 2021, v. 29, n. 3, p. 535
- Grobman-Morales, Jessica;
- "Andy" Parrish, Jr., Anthony R.;
- Zeiner, Carol L.
- Article
29
- British Journal of Criminology, 2016, v. 56, n. 2, p. 370, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azv050
- QUIROUETTE, MARIANNE;
- HANNAH-MOFFAT, KELLY;
- MAURUTTO, PAULA
- Article
30
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2020, v. 50, n. 3, p. 799
- Article
31
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 139
- Article
32
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 1, p. 319
- Article
33
- eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2011, v. 18, n. 2, p. 1
- Larsen, Ann-Claire;
- Milnes, Peter
- Article
34
- University of British Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 1185
- Article
35
- Asian Journal of Law & Society, 2016, v. 3, n. 1, p. 135, doi. 10.1017/als.2016.6
- Article
36
- Politics, Bureaucracy & Justice, 2009, v. 1, n. 2, p. 20
- Article
37
- Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 2010, v. 3, n. 2, p. 127
- Article
38
- Journal of Social Service Research, 2007, v. 34, n. 2, p. 25, doi. 10.1300/J079v34n02_03
- Petrucci, Carrie J.;
- Quinlan, Kathleen M.
- Article
39
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2011, v. 28, n. 3, p. 493, doi. 10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
- Article
40
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2012, v. 15, n. 1, p. 366, doi. 10.4314/pelj.v15i1.11
- Article
41
- Capital University Law Review, 2014, v. 42, n. 2, p. 491
- Article
42
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2004, v. 52, n. 12, p. 2136, doi. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52588.x
- Article
43
- Yale Law Journal, 2008, v. 118, n. 2, p. 272, doi. 10.2307/20454711
- Article
44
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2021, v. 47, n. 2, p. 419
- Article
45
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005, v. 33, n. 4, p. 59
- Schma, William;
- Kjervik, Diane;
- Petrucci, Carrie
- Article
46
- Judicature, 2012, v. 96, n. 1, p. 36
- Article
47
- Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, 2013, v. 5, p. 24
- Article
48
- Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.1353/ppp.0.0295
- Article
49
- Seattle University Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
50
- Seattle University Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 2, p. 427
- Article