Works matching DE "LOCUS standi"
1
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 3, p. 525, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12417
- Article
2
- Classical Russia / Imperskaia Rossiia 1700-1825, 2008, v. 3-5, p. 109
- Martínez-Villalba, Juan Carlos Riofrío
- Article
3
- St. John's Law Review, 2006, v. 80, n. 1, p. 455
- Article
4
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 597
- Article
5
- American University Law Review, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 933
- Article
6
- American University Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 735
- LUK, OLIVIA T.;
- BASU, PALASH;
- DOOLEY, RYAN;
- GREEN, CHARLES;
- HAAN, BRIAN E.;
- KIM, GINA;
- SZPONDOWSKI, KARA L.
- Article
7
- American University Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 5, p. 1525
- Article
9
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2022, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1033
- Article
10
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 743
- Article
11
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1071
- Article
12
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2014, v. 29, n. 1, p. 25
- Melone, Matthew A.;
- Nation III, George A.
- Article
13
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 5, p. 1395
- Article
14
- Banking Law Journal, 2014, v. 131, n. 6, p. 444
- Article
15
- Banking Law Journal, 2013, v. 130, n. 10, p. 951
- Article
16
- Banking Law Journal, 2013, v. 130, n. 6, p. 491
- WHITE, JASON;
- FRANK, JOSEPH;
- KAHN, DANIEL;
- DICKSON, ADAM
- Article
17
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 225
- Article
18
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2022, v. 93, n. 4, p. 961
- Article
19
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1203
- Article
20
- Judicial Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2014.11426821
- Article
21
- Judicial Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2014.11426820
- Article
22
- eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2009, v. 16, n. 2, p. 106
- Article
23
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2000, v. 27, n. 3, p. 699
- Article
24
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 54, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
26
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 3, p. 1517
- Article
27
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 476
- Article
28
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2012, v. 15, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2012.00439.x
- Jiang, Fuxiao;
- Gervais, Daniel
- Article
29
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
30
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2009, v. 59, n. 4, p. 1089
- Article
31
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2009, v. 59, n. 4, p. 1061
- Article
33
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2002, v. 52, n. 3, p. 753
- Article
34
- Juridica International, 2009, v. 16, p. 176
- Article
35
- Review of Litigation, 2010, v. 29, n. 4, p. 951
- Article
36
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2011, v. 85, n. 4, p. 363
- Article
37
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2002, v. 76, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
38
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2014, v. 23, p. 179
- Article
39
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2007, v. 7, n. 2, p. 215, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2007.11421483
- Article
40
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2014, v. 17, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
41
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2010, v. 13, n. 5, p. 27
- Article
42
- Penn State Law Review, 2021, v. 125, n. 2, p. 533
- Article
43
- Mercer Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1223
- Article
44
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1183
- Article
45
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 3, p. 603
- Article
46
- Alabama Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
47
- Cornell Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
48
- Cornell Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 3, p. 627
- Article
49
- Tennessee Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 1, p. 303
- Article
50
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 9, p. 20
- Article