Allocating costs in Ninth Circuit predatory pricing cases: "Marsann Co. v. Brammall, Inc." and its problematic progeny, "Inglis v. Continental Baking" and "Thales v. Matsushita."Published in:Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 3, p. 651, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400305By:Wazzan, C. Paul;Frech, III, H. E.Publication type:Article