Dissenting into the Future: The Supreme Court's Dissent in McGirt, UNDRIP, and the Future of Indigenous Land Rights.
- Published in:
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2021, v. 48, n. 2, p. 729, doi. 10.15779/Z38KD1QM1G
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Dissents and the Supreme Court
Results: 125
1
2
Don’t Stop Believin’1: An Appreciation of Recent Idaho Supreme Court Dissents and Concurrences.
- Published in:
- Advocate (05154987), 2021, v. 64, n. 2, p. 28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Dissents from the Bench: A Compilation of Oral Dissents by U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
- Published in:
- Law Library Journal, 2010, v. 102, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Judicial Disagreement need not be Political: Dissent on the Estonian Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Case Study
5
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF DISSENT AT THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 2, p. 913
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
THE GREAT DISSENTS OF THE "LONE DISSENTER": Justice Jesse W. Carter's Twenty Tumultuous Years on the California Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
7
Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada.
- Published in:
- International Journal of the Legal Profession, 2008, v. 15, n. 1/2, p. 57, doi. 10.1080/09695950802439700
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Dissent Aversion and Sequential Voting in the Brazilian Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2019, v. 16, n. 4, p. 933, doi. 10.1111/jels.12236
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Supreme Court consensus and dissent: Estimating the role of the selection screen.
- Published in:
- Public Choice, 2006, v. 127, n. 3/4, p. 367, doi. 10.1007/s11127-006-8290-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Supreme Court consensus and dissent: Estimating the role of the selection screen.
- Published in:
- Public Choice, 2005, v. 122, n. 3/4, p. 483, doi. 10.1007/s11127-005-7517-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
DISSENTS OF THE BERCH COURT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF UNANIMITY IN A STATE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Diversity, Dissent and Representation: Lessons From The First Minority Judge in the Israeli Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Social & Legal Studies, 2022, v. 31, n. 4, p. 603, doi. 10.1177/09646639211043801
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign Against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
14
Gender, judicial dissent, and issue salience: the voting behavior of state supreme court justices in sexual harassment cases, 1980–1998
- Published in:
- Social Science Journal, 2003, v. 40, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00260-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888–1999.
- Published in:
- Review of Policy Research, 2004, v. 21, n. 3, p. 429, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00085.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
US Supreme Court Denies Review of Idaho's Abolition of Insanity Defense; Three Justices Dissent.
- Published in:
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 12
- Publication type:
- Article
17
The Supreme Court, Yeshiva Students, and Military Conscription: Judicial Review, the Grunis Dissent, and its Implications for Israeli Democracy and Law.
- Published in:
- Israel Studies, 2018, v. 23, n. 3, p. 197, doi. 10.2979/israelstudies.23.3.24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
SIGNED OPINIONS, CONCURRENCES, DISSENTS, AND VOTE COUNTS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: BOON OR BANE? (A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS PENROSE AND SHERRY).
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 525
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Are Mailing Lists Protected Free Speech? Despite Dissent, the Supreme Court Remains Silent.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003, v. 31, n. 2, p. 214, doi. 10.1177/0092070303031002014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Many Voices, One Court: The Origin and Role of Dissent in the Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2011, v. 36, n. 3, p. 193, doi. 10.1353/sch.2011.0002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
DISSENT, THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT AND THE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- New Zealand Journal of Public & International Law, 2013, v. 11, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
23
An Apologia To Radical Dissent And A Supreme Court Test To Protect It.
- Published in:
- Communication Law & Policy, 2002, v. 7, n. 4, p. 401, doi. 10.1207/S15326926CLP0704_04
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
25
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
26
Press and Speech Under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Acts of 1798, and the Campaign Against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
27
Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
28
'Continuing Custom': Indigenous Inheritance in the Indian Supreme Court's Kishwar v Bihar Dissent.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2024, v. 25, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
De Quem Divergem os Divergentes: os Votos Vencidos no Supremo Tribunal Federal.
- Published in:
- Direito, Estado e Sociedade, 2015, n. 47, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff v. O'Neill.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
31
WHY (AND WHEN) JUDGES DISSENT: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Legal Analysis, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1093/jla/3.1.101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
'The silent man': From Lochner to Hammer v. Dagenhart, a reevaluation of justice William R. Day.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The Justice Who Changed His Mind: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and the Story behind Abrams v. United States.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1353/sch.2014.0024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
JANUS AND THE MOVEMENT DISSENT.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 2, p. 371
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Does Seniority Matter? The Conditional Influence of State Methods of Judicial Retention.
- Published in:
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2010, v. 91, n. 1, p. 209, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00689.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Dissent, Legitimacy, and Public Support for Court Decisions: Evidence from a Survey‐Based Experiment.
- Published in:
- Law & Society Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 2, p. 588, doi. 10.1111/lasr.12402
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Book reviews.
- Published in:
- 1995
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
38
Newspaper Coverage Limited For State Supreme Court Cases.
- Published in:
- Newspaper Research Journal, 2006, v. 27, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1177/073953290602700102
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Culpability and the Equality Value: The Legacy of the Martineau Dissent.
- Published in:
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2003, v. 15, n. 1, p. 53
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
DECODING NONDELEGATION AFTER GUNDY: WHAT THE EXPERIENCE IN STATE COURTS TELLS US ABOUT WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN WE'RE EXPECTING.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2022, v. 71, n. 3, p. 417
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
EL JUSTICE OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES: «THE GREAT DISSENTER» DE LA SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Teoria y Realidad Constitucional, 2010, n. 25, p. 129
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
The Boys Down There: South Carolina and Thurgood Marshall's Appointment to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Published in:
- Journal of Political Science, 2017, v. 45, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
The Curious Case of Tort Liability for a Defective Product That the Defendant Did Not Make, Sell, or Distribute.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 1, p. 135
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Plea-Bargaining Law After Lafler and Frye.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 3, p. 595
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE VINDICATED DISSENTS OF THE NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, FROM 2000 TO 2010.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 2, p. 931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Lost and Found: The Republicans Haven't Lost Their Conservative Minds.
- Published in:
- CounterPunch, 2023, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Sentencing Illicit Drug Traffickers: How do the Courts Handle Random Sampling Issues?
- Published in:
- International Statistical Review, 2003, v. 71, n. 3, p. 535, doi. 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2003.tb00210.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Supreme Court Auditing of the US Courts of Appeals: An Organizational Perspective.
- Published in:
- Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 2007, v. 17, n. 4, p. 607
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
State Supreme Court voting behavior: A comparative analysis.
- Published in:
- Social Science Journal, 1992, v. 29, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1016/0362-3319(92)90015-A
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Judicial Consensus and Public Opinion: Conditional Response to Supreme Court Majority Size.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2014, v. 67, n. 2, p. 320, doi. 10.1177/1065912913497840
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article