Methylmercury Impairs Components of the Cholinergic System in Captive Mink (Mustela vison).

Basu, Niladri; Scheuhammer, Anton M.; Rouvinen-Watt, Kirsti; Grochowina, Nicole; Klenavic, Kate; Evans, R. Douglas; Hing Man Chan

The effects of methylmercury (MeHg) on components of the cholinergic system were evaluated in captive mink (Mustela vison). Cholinergic parameters were measured in brain regions (occipital cortex, cerebellum, brain stem, basal ganglia) and blood (whole blood, plasma, serum) following an 89-day exposure to MeHg at dietary concentrations of 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 ppm (n = 12 animals per treatment). There were no effects of MeHg on brain choline acetyltransferase, acetylcholine, and choline transporter. However, significantly higher densities of muscarinic cholinergic receptors, as assessed by 3H-quinuclidinyl benzilate binding, were measured in the occipital cortex (30.2 and 39.0% higher in the 1 and 2 ppm groups, respectively), basal ganglia (67.5 and 69.1% higher in the 0.5 and 1 ppm groups, respectively), and brain stem (64.4% higher in the 0.5 ppm group), compared to nonexposed controls. The calculated positive relationship between MeHg exposure and muscarinic cholinergic receptor levels in this dosing study were consistent with observations in wild mink. There were no MeHg-related effects on blood cholinesterase (ChE) activity, but ChE activity was significantly higher in the occipital cortex (17.0% in the 1 ppm group) and basal ganglia (34.1% in the 0.5 ppm group), compared to nonexposed controls. The parallel increases in muscarinic cholinergic receptor levels and ChE activity following MeHg exposure highlight the autoregulatory nature of cholinergic neurotransmission. In conclusion, these laboratory data support findings from wild mink and demonstrate that ecologically relevant exposures to MeHg (i.e., 0.5 ppm in diet) have the potential to alter the cholinergic system in specific brain regions.

METHYLMERCURY; MINKS; MUSCARINIC receptors; PARASYMPATHOMIMETIC agents; BASAL ganglia

Toxicological Sciences, 2006, Vol 91, Issue 1, p202

1096-6080

Academic Journal

10.1093/toxsci/kfj121