Works matching DE "LEGAL status of unmarried couples"
1
- Population & Development Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 3, p. 435, doi. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x
- Perelli-Harris, Brienna;
- Gassen, Nora Sánchez
- Article
2
- Marriage & Family Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 2, p. 73, doi. 10.1080/01494929.2011.564525
- Johnson, Matthew D.;
- Anderson, Jared R.;
- Aducci, C. J.
- Article
3
- Marriage & Family Review, 1995, v. 21, n. 3/4, p. 141, doi. 10.1300/J002v21n03_08
- Article
4
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2010, p. 571
- Article
5
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 473, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt019
- Article
6
- Family Court Review, 2020, v. 58, n. 1, p. 157, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12461
- Article
7
- California Law Review, 2016, v. 104, n. 5, p. 1207, doi. 10.15779/Z38R55K
- Article
9
- Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2014, v. 29, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
10
- Revue de Droit: Université de Sherbrooke, 2012, v. 42, n. 3, p. 409, doi. 10.17118/11143/10278
- LECKEY, Robert;
- BALA, Nicholas
- Article
11
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 2, p. 373
- Stçpien-Sporek, Anna;
- Ryznar, Margaret
- Article
13
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
14
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 624, doi. 10.1080/13642980903534360
- Chinwuba, Nwudego Nkemakonam
- Article
15
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 2, p. 258, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01449.x
- Article
16
- Family Court Review, 2003, v. 41, n. 1, p. 104, doi. 10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00872.x
- Article
17
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2012, v. 28, n. 4, p. 734, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewr002
- Article
18
- Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 2008, v. 62, n. 3, p. 56
- Larson, Robert B.;
- Larson, Stephen J.
- Article
19
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 6, p. 1321
- Article
20
- Law & Philosophy, 1983, v. 2, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
21
- Journal of Mormon History, 2020, v. 46, n. 4, p. 60, doi. 10.5406/jmormhist.46.4.0060
- Article
22
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1071
- Article
23
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2015, v. 27, n. 1, p. 112, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.27.1.112
- Article
25
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2010, v. 13, n. 3, p. 238
- Article
26
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 967
- Article
27
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 1, p. 16
- BEA, THERESA;
- BOULETTE, MIKE
- Article
29
- Adoption & Fostering, 2008, v. 32, n. 3, p. 90
- Article
30
- Lien Social et Politiques, 2011, n. 66, p. 65, doi. 10.7202/1008873ar
- BELLEAU, HÉLÈNE;
- CORNUT ST-PIERRE, PASCALE
- Article
31
- Family Matters, 1998, n. 49, p. 54
- Article
32
- Family Matters, 1998, n. 49, p. 52
- Article
33
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 197
- Article
34
- Humanitas (07172168), 2011, v. 16, n. 61, p. 8
- DOMÍNGUEZ HIDALGO, CARMEN
- Article
35
- CPA Journal, 1999, v. 69, n. 6, p. 13
- Article
37
- Temple Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
38
- Tulane Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
39
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 2, p. 30
- Article
40
- Family Law Quarterly, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 349
- JENNINGS-LAX, LESLIE I.;
- TRUAX, LOUISE T.
- Article
41
- Family Law Quarterly, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 303
- Article
42
- Family Law Quarterly, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
43
- Family Law Quarterly, 2011, v. 45, n. 3, p. 329
- Article
45
- George Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 90, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
46
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 561
- Article
47
- Maryland Law Review, 2021, v. 80, n. 3, p. 627
- Article
48
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1003, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2012.0006
- Article
49
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2018, v. 26, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1007/s10691-018-9364-5
- Article
50
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 5, p. 641, doi. 10.3138/utlj.2136
- Article