Works matching Supreme Court and commerce
1
- Connecticut Law Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 5, p. 1645
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 1940, v. 28, n. 2, p. 168, doi. 10.2307/3476248
- Article
3
- International Journal of Business & Public Administration, 2017, v. 14, n. 1, p. 56
- D'Amico, Jeffrey R.;
- Galasso, Christina;
- Lucido, Peter D.
- Article
4
- Public Health Reports, 2011, v. 126, n. 5, p. 750, doi. 10.1177/003335491112600518
- Rosenbaum, Sara;
- RUTKOW, LAINIE;
- VERNICK, JON S.
- Article
5
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1859
- Article
7
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
8
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2011, v. 78, n. 3, p. 350
- Berkelhammer, Jonathan A.
- Article
9
- Pravnik, Law & Society Review, 2007, v. 41, n. 84, p. 95
- Article
10
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 703
- Article
11
- Journal of State Taxation, 2023, v. 41, n. 4, p. 5
- Bernard, Mary F.;
- Nachbar, Mark L.
- Article
12
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 227
- Article
14
- American University Business Law Review, 2024, v. 14, n. 1, p. 381
- Article
15
- Florida Bar Journal, 2011, v. 85, n. 9, p. 52
- Article
16
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2010, p. 263
- Article
17
- American Economic Review, 1946, v. 36, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
18
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
19
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 1020
- Article
20
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2019, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
21
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 2, p. 667
- Article
22
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 5, p. 1217
- Article
23
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2022, v. 30, n. 3, p. 825
- Article
24
- Women's Rights Law Reporter, 2018, v. 40, n. 1/2, p. 1
- Article
25
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukraini, 2021, v. 9, n. 11, p. 115, doi. 10.33498/louu-2021-11-115
- Article
26
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2003, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2019, v. 5, n. 3, p. 453, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2019/3/23
- Rotenberg, Marc;
- Petkova, Bilyana
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
29
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2003, v. 58, n. 3, p. 4
- Article
30
- American Economic Review, 1930, v. 20, n. 4, p. 729
- Thumbower, Henry R.;
- Morgan, Charles S.
- Article
31
- Pace Law Review, 2020, v. 40, n. 1, p. 44, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.2008
- Article
32
- Capital University Law Review, 2014, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
33
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
34
- Columbia Law Review, 2008, v. 108, n. 8, p. 1991
- Article
35
- Tax Lawyer, 2017, v. 70, n. 4, p. 833
- Article
36
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 3, p. 741
- Wolongevicz, Lauren Joseph
- Article
37
- Iowa Law Review, 2025, v. 110, n. 2, p. 905
- Article
38
- Tax Executive, 2017, v. 69, n. 3, p. 20
- Fields, Craig B.;
- Newmark, Mitchell A.;
- Gibilaro, Eugene J.
- Article
39
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
40
- Michigan Law Review, 2024, v. 122, n. 8, p. 1623, doi. 10.36644/mlr.122.8.bounded
- Mason, Ruth;
- Knoll, Michael S.
- Article
41
- Indiana Law Journal, 2018, v. 93, n. 3, p. 653
- Article
42
- ABA Tax Times, 2015, v. 35, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
43
- Journal of Education, 1914, v. 80, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
44
- Journal of Education, 1913, v. 77, n. 25, p. 690, doi. 10.1177/002205741307702501
- Article
45
- Journal of Education, 1912, v. 75, n. 25, p. 694, doi. 10.1177/002205741207502501
- Article
46
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 2, p. 563
- Article
47
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2011, v. 35, n. 2, p. 375
- Article
48
- Financial Executive, 2012, v. 28, n. 8, p. 68
- BARTEK, JAMES;
- LIPPMAN, MICHAEL;
- PRITCHARD, JENNIFER
- Article
49
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2003, v. 19, n. 2, p. 543, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewg020
- Carrubba, Clifford;
- Rogers, James A.
- Article
50
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2021, v. 66, n. 4, p. 481, doi. 10.1177/0003603X211045434
- Article