We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Inferences and Legal Considerations Following a Blood Collection Tube Recall.
- Authors
Rodda, Luke N; Pearring, Sue; Harper, Curt E; Tiscione, Nicholas B; Jones, Alan Wayne
- Abstract
In mid-2019, medical, forensic and legal communities were notified that a certain shipment of evacuated blood sampling tubes were recalled by the manufacturer. This recall order described that the preservative sodium fluoride (100 mg) and anticoagulant potassium oxalate (20 mg) were missing from a small batch of 10-mL evacuated tubes. This gave cause for concern for possible implications in criminal justice (e.g. in drink-driving offenses) when blood–alcohol concentrations are interpreted. In reality, the lack of an anticoagulant would have been immediately obvious during sample preparation, owing to the formation of a large clot in the tube when received. Certain impairing drugs (e.g. cocaine and 6-acetylmorphine) are unstable in blood and tend to degrade without an enzyme inhibitor, such as sodium fluoride, present. In reviewing available literature related to current practices and the stability of ethanol in stored blood samples, there does not appear to be a clear consensus regarding the amount of sodium fluoride preservative necessary, if any at all, when blood is taken from living subjects under sterile conditions for typical forensic ethanol analysis.
- Subjects
BLOOD collection; SODIUM fluoride; TUBES; BLOOD sampling
- Publication
Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2021, Vol 45, Issue 2, p211
- ISSN
0146-4760
- Publication type
Academic Journal
- DOI
10.1093/jat/bkaa056