Works matching DE "RETIRED judges"
3
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2011, v. 34, n. 2, p. 483
- Pitel, Stephen G. A.;
- Bortolin, Will
- Article
4
- Connecticut Bar Journal, 2020, v. 93, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
5
- Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 293, doi. 10.1177/0951629811411751
- Bailey, Michael A;
- Yoon, Albert
- Article
6
- Social Science Journal, 1999, v. 36, n. 3, p. 431, doi. 10.1016/S0362-3319(99)00015-4
- Article
7
- Economic Record, 2005, v. 81, n. 254, p. 193, doi. 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00255.x
- Maitra, Pushkar;
- Smyth, Russell
- Article
8
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 5, p. 764
- Article
9
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 4, p. 611
- Article
10
- Political Research Quarterly, 1995, v. 48, n. 3, p. 573, doi. 10.2307/449003
- Spriggs, James F.;
- Wahlbeck, Paul J.
- Article
11
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2010, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1353/sch.2010.0020
- Article
12
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2010, v. 35, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.1353/sch.2010.0021
- Article
13
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2010, v. 35, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1353/sch.2010.0022
- Article
14
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2009, v. 34, n. 2, p. 196, doi. 10.1353/sch.2009.0013
- Article
15
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 59
- Article
16
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 56
- Article
17
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 50
- Article
18
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 47
- Article
19
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 40
- Article
20
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 37
- Article
21
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 34
- Article
22
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 28
- Article
25
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 19
- Article
26
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 17
- Article
27
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 13
- CUÉLLAR, MARIANO-FLORENTINO
- Article
28
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 10
- Article
29
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 7
- Article
30
- California Legal History, 2017, v. 12, p. 3
- Article
31
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2018, v. 49, n. 2, p. 265
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 2019, v. 107, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.15779/Z38ZK55M67
- Article
33
- Utah Bar Journal, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 24
- Nelson, Julie J.;
- Sudbury, Noella A.
- Article
36
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 3, p. 703
- Article
37
- Queen's Law Journal, 2021, v. 46, n. 2, p. 243
- Mancini, Mark;
- Sigalet, Geoffrey
- Article
38
- Advocate (05154987), 2020, p. 216
- Article
39
- Advocate (05154987), 2018, p. 226
- Article
40
- Advocate (05154987), 2018, v. 61, n. 1, p. 14
- Article
41
- Advocate (05154987), 2017, v. 60, n. 11/12, p. 19
- Article
42
- Advocate (05154987), 2017, v. 60, n. 5, p. 21
- Article
43
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2016, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/jels.12101
- Article
44
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2012, v. 161, n. 1, p. 1
- BURBANK, STEPHEN B.;
- PLAGER, S. JAY;
- ABLAVSKY, GREGORY
- Article
45
- Industrial Law Journal, 2013, v. 42, n. 3, p. 289, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwt010
- GYULAVÁRI, TAMÁS;
- HõS, NIKOLETT
- Article
46
- Journal of American History, 2019, v. 106, n. 1, p. 47, doi. 10.1093/jahist/jaz167
- Article
47
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2014, v. 37, p. 251
- Article
48
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2010, v. 41, n. 4, p. 703, doi. 10.26686/vuwlr.v41i4.5211
- Article
49
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 4, p. 887, doi. 10.18060/4806.01111
- Article
50
- Indiana Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1009
- Article