Clarification on the legal status of human remains in university collections of human anatomy in France.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter
Works matching DE "BIOETHICS laws"
Results: 64
1
2
Justice and Guidance for the COVID-19 Pandemic.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2020, v. 20, n. 7, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2020.1777354
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 34, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328542
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Opportunities Missed and Created by the New Common Rule.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 36, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328541
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Final Rule: When the Rubber Meets the Road.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 27, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329484
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
A Proposed Process for Reliably Updating the Common Rule.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 8, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329478
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Modernizing Research Regulations Is Not Enough: It's Time to Think Outside the Regulatory Box.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
8
Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 22, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329483
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Rethinking the Belmont Report?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 15, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The “Reasonable Person” Standard for Research Informed Consent.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 49, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328540
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
A Measure of Effectiveness Is Key to the Success of sIRB Policy.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 41, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328537
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The Challenges of Other Legal and Regulatory Standards on Informed Consent.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 51, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328536
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Common Rule Revised: Opportunities Lost.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 46, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328538
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Comprehension and Choice Under the Revised Common Rule: Improving Informed Consent by Offering Reasons Why Some Enroll in Research and Others Do Not.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 53, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The Indefinite “Stay” on Regulatory Reforms for Research With Prisoners.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 55, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328534
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Clinical Results to Research Participants.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 58, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328532
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Dollars and Deadlines: Rule Reforms in Short Time Frames.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 62, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328533
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Beyond Belmont: Ensuring Respect for AI/AN Communities Through Tribal IRBs, Laws, and Policies.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 60, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328531
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The sIRB System: A Single Beacon of Progress in the Revised Common Rule?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2017, v. 17, n. 7, p. 43, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328530
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Survivors' Interests in Human Remains.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2009, v. 9, n. 8, p. 16, doi. 10.1080/15265160902940006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
생명윤리법 벌칙조항: 문제점과 개선방안.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Korean Medical Association / Taehan Uisa Hyophoe Chi, 2018, v. 61, n. 7, p. 392, doi. 10.5124/jkma.2018.61.7.392
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE ROLE OF THE LEGAL NORM IN BIOETHICS.
- Published in:
- Juridical Current, 2018, v. 21, n. 4, p. 146
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Compromise is in sight for new embryo research rules in France.
- Published in:
- Nature Medicine, 2011, v. 17, n. 2, p. 142, doi. 10.1038/nm0211-142a
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Defining Dignity and Its Place in Human Rights.
- Published in:
- New Bioethics, 2014, v. 20, n. 1, p. 12, doi. 10.1179/2050287714Z.00000000041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Letter.
- Published in:
- 2014
- Publication type:
- Letter
26
ASPECTOS ÉTICOS Y LEGALES DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN BRASIL.
- Published in:
- Acta Bioéthica, 2010, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.4067/S1726-569X2010000100009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Egregious Ethics Violations Require Involvement of State Medical Boards.
- Published in:
- Medical Ethics Advisor, 2024, v. 40, n. 5, p. 1
- Publication type:
- Article
28
PERSONS, PARTS AND PROPERTY. HOW SHOULD WE REGULATE HUMAN TISSUE IN THE 21<sup>ST</sup> CENTURY? Eds Imogen Goold, Kate Greasley, Jonathan Herring and Loane Skene Oxford: Hart (), 2014. xxiv+309 pp. ISBN 978184946465. £65.
- Published in:
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2015, v. 19, n. 3, p. 430, doi. 10.3366/elr.2015.0309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
How Should Ethics Consultants Weigh the Law (and other Authoritative Directives)?
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2020, v. 48, n. 4, p. 768, doi. 10.1177/1073110520979388
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Under Attack: Reconceptualizing Informed Consent.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1177/1073110517703095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Biobank Regulation in South Korea.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 2, p. 342, doi. 10.1177/1073110516654127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Including Public Health Content in a Bioethics and Law Course: Vaccine Exemptions, Tort Liability, and Public Health.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, p. 22, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Genomic Research with the Newly Dead: A Crossroads for Ethics and Policy.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2014, v. 42, n. 2, p. 220, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property?
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2007, v. 35, n. 3, p. 440, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00166.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
WITHDRAWING LIFE SUPPORT UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION AND THE ICCPR.
- Published in:
- Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2016, v. 3, n. 2, p. 240
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
The Era of Publication Ethics.
- Published in:
- Korean Journal of Urology, 2013, v. 54, n. 12, p. 805, doi. 10.4111/kju.2013.54.12.805
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Bioethics in Corrections.
- Published in:
- Correctional Health Today, 2009, v. 1, n. 1, p. 49
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Profile: Edmund D Pellegrino.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 2007, v. 25, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.1038/nbt0107-11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
French ethics law revised.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 2001, v. 19, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1038/83550
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
BIOETHICS LEGISLATION IN SELECTED COUNTRIES.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Ethics (1556-4444), 2014, v. 10, n. 3, p. 253
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Pressure grows for relaxation of French embryo research laws.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1998, v. 395, n. 6702, p. 532, doi. 10.1038/26820
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Europe plans convention on social impacts of biomedical technologies.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1994, v. 370, n. 6484, p. 3, doi. 10.1038/370003a0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Compromise reached on bioethics bill.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1994, v. 369, n. 6482, p. 599, doi. 10.1038/369599b0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Ethics bill prompts second thoughts among scientists.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1994, v. 367, n. 6460, p. 209, doi. 10.1038/367209a0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Bioethical and legal perspectives on cell reprogramming technologies.
- Published in:
- Medical Law International, 2016, v. 16, n. 3/4, p. 206, doi. 10.1177/0968533216677860
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
The Never-Ending Myth: An Analysis of the Sociopsychologica! Mechanism of Hwang Woo-Suk Syndrome.
- Published in:
- Korea Journal, 2009, v. 49, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.25024/kj.2009.49.2.137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Unexpected Commonalities: The Applicability of Bioethics Concepts to Insider Trading Law.
- Published in:
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 689
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Book Review: George P. Smith, II's Law and Bioethics--Intersections along the Mortal Coil.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
49
LA NOTION DE « PROJET PARENTAL » DANS LE DROIT DE L'ASSISTANCE MÉDICALE À LA PROCRÉATION (AMP).
- Published in:
- Tocqueville Review -- La Revue Tocqueville, 2013, v. 34, n. 2, p. 19, doi. 10.1353/toc.2013.0013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
THE PATIENT-DOCTOR RELATIONSHIP: WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 3, p. 583
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article