Works matching DE "CRIMINAL defendants"
1
- Social Forces, 2021, v. 100, n. 1, p. 194, doi. 10.1093/sf/soaa082
- Article
2
- Yuridika, 2022, v. 37, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34704
- Article
3
- law&history, 2021, v. 8, n. 1, p. 82
- Article
4
- Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminologia, 2010, v. 3, p. 299
- Agustina SanllehÍ, JosÉ R.
- Article
5
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2017, v. 42, n. 2, p. 443, doi. 10.1007/s12103-016-9367-1
- Bechtel, Kristin;
- Holsinger, Alexander;
- Lowenkamp, Christopher;
- Warren, Madeline
- Article
6
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 661, doi. 10.1007/s12103-014-9268-0
- Sacks, Meghan;
- Sainato, Vincenzo;
- Ackerman, Alissa
- Article
7
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 37, n. 4, p. 544, doi. 10.1007/s12103-011-9144-0
- Liang, Bin;
- Long, Michael;
- Brame, Wendy
- Article
8
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2003, v. 27, n. 2, p. 145, doi. 10.1007/BF02885691
- Johnson, Brian R.;
- Warchol, Greg L.
- Article
9
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2000, v. 24, n. 2, p. 235, doi. 10.1007/BF02887595
- Carlan, Philip E.;
- Byxbe, Ferris R.
- Article
10
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2021, v. 45, n. 2, p. 310
- SUMMERVILL, TARA N.;
- BENNARDO, KEVIN
- Article
11
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 523
- Article
12
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
13
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2011, v. 78, n. 4, p. 389
- Parker, Bruce R.;
- Gray, David S.
- Article
14
- Modern Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 109, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12004
- Rumney, Philip N.S.;
- Fenton, Rachel Anne
- Article
15
- Modern Law Review, 2008, v. 71, n. 3, p. 413, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00699.x
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 2023, v. 111, p. 927, doi. 10.15779/Z38X921K5T
- Article
17
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 1, p. 135, doi. 10.15779/Z38WW7703F
- Article
18
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2024, v. 42, n. 3, p. 241, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2655
- Zhang, Tianyi;
- Nesbit, Ariana;
- Datta, Vivek
- Article
19
- 2017
- Mikolajewski, Amy J.;
- Manguno‐Mire, Gina M.;
- Coffman, Kelly L.;
- Deland, Sarah M.;
- Thompson, John W.;
- Manguno-Mire, Gina M;
- Thompson, John W Jr
- journal article
20
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2015, v. 33, n. 2/3, p. 257, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2174
- Schreiber, Jeremy;
- Green, Debbie;
- Kunz, Michal;
- Belfi, Brian;
- Pequeno, Gabriela
- Article
21
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2012, v. 30, n. 6, p. 710, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2040
- Morris, Douglas R.;
- DeYoung, Nathaniel J.
- Article
22
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2012, v. 30, n. 6, p. 749, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2032
- Frumkin, I. Bruce;
- Lally, Stephen J.;
- Sexton, James E.
- Article
23
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2011, v. 29, n. 4, p. 592, doi. 10.1002/bsl.995
- Schweitzer, N. J.;
- Saks, Michael J.
- Article
24
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2010, v. 28, n. 5, p. 603, doi. 10.1002/bsl.956
- Guenther, Christina C.;
- Otto, Randy K.
- Article
25
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2010, v. 28, n. 5, p. 647, doi. 10.1002/bsl.957
- Fanniff, Amanda M.;
- Otto, Randy K.;
- Petrila, John
- Article
26
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, v. 25, n. 6, p. 891, doi. 10.1002/bsl.775
- Mueller, Crystal;
- Wylie, A. Michael
- Article
27
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, v. 25, n. 6, p. 781, doi. 10.1002/bsl.777
- DeMatteo, David;
- Marczyk, Geoffrey;
- Pich, Michele
- Article
28
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, v. 25, n. 4, p. 545, doi. 10.1002/bsl.735
- Everington, Caroline;
- Notario-Smull, Heidi;
- Horton, Mel L.
- Article
29
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2006, v. 24, n. 5, p. 633, doi. 10.1002/bsl.661
- Kucharski, L. Thomas;
- Duncan, Scott;
- Egan, Shannon S.;
- Falkenbach, Diana M.
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2021, v. 89, n. 1, p. 52
- Article
31
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2018, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1564
- Backus, Mary Sue;
- Marcus, Paul
- Article
32
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
33
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2023, v. 16, n. 1, p. 156
- Article
34
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2022, v. 15, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
35
- Neural Computing & Applications, 2022, v. 34, n. 11, p. 8885, doi. 10.1007/s00521-022-06909-y
- Article
36
- International Journal of Punishment & Sentencing, 2011, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
37
- Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 1984, v. 5, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1207/s15324834basp0501_4
- Article
38
- Alabama Lawyer, 2017, v. 78, n. 1, p. 78
- Article
39
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
40
- St. John's Law Review, 2011, v. 85, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
41
- American University Law Review, 2021, v. 70, n. 3, p. 1125
- Article
42
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1471
- Article
43
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1471
- Article
44
- San Diego Law Review, 2021, v. 58, n. 2, p. 379
- Article
45
- San Diego Law Review, 2009, v. 46, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
46
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 3, p. 525
- Article
47
- Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 2023, v. 106, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1515/mks-2023-0022
- Blair, Rebecca;
- Krinsky, Miriam Aroni
- Article
48
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 2, p. 341
- Article
49
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 1, p. 199
- Article