Challenging judicial impartiality: When accusations of derailments of strategic maneuvering derail.
- Published in:
- Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2019, v. 8, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1075/jaic.17026.plu
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "DISQUALIFICATION of judges"
Results: 89
1
2
Reversal by Recusal? Comer v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc. and the Need for Mandatory Judicial Recusal Statements.
- Published in:
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 177
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Imputed Disqualification--Part-Time Judges and Part-Time Assistant District Attorneys.
- Published in:
- Alabama Lawyer, 2020, v. 81, n. 5, p. 380
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The New (and Improved) Judicial Recusal Law.
- Published in:
- Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 6, p. 362
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
DECIDING RECUSAL MOTIONS: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1085
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
RESHAPING RECUSAL PROCEDURES: ELIMINATING DECISIONMAKER BIAS AND PROMOTING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE RECENT CHANGES INTRODUCED TO THE METHOD OF REMOVAL OF JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH & THE CONSEQUENT TRIUMPH OF AN ALL POWERFUL EXECUTIVE OVER THE JUDICIARY: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN PERIL.
- Published in:
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, 2021, v. 5, n. 2, p. 653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
CONFIDENTIALITY, DUE PROCESS, AND JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION IN THE UNIFIED FAMILY COURT: REPORT TO THE HONORABLE STEPHANIE DOMITROVICH.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2008, v. 46, n. 2, p. 340, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00204.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Recent Decisions.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1927, v. 15, n. 3, p. 262
- Publication type:
- Article
10
A Review of Recent Cases in the Courts for the Quarter Ending December, 1919.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1920, v. 8, n. 2, p. 95, doi. 10.2307/3474453
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
In re Anderson and the Removal of Utah State Court Judges: The Supreme Court of Utah and its Review of Judicial Conduct Commission Orders.
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2005, v. 19, n. 2, p. 473
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
REMOVAL OF JUDGES FOR WILFUL MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE: GEILER v. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 1974, v. 12, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1974.tb00337.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Impeachment by Any Other Name.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2022, v. 70, n. 5, p. 689
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND THE EXTRAJUDICIAL DIVIDE.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 4, p. 1539
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY IN RECENT CIVIL RIGHTS VICTORIES: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN IN FLOYD V. NEW YORK CITY.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 23, n. 1, p. 197
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG: A SURVEY OF THE PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE OF CANADIAN PROVINCIAL AND TERRITORIAL JUDGES CONCERNING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 3, p. 569, doi. 10.29173/alr144
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
The Composition of Judicial Benches, Disqualification and Excusal of Judges at the International Criminal Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 11, n. 2, p. 379, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqt005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE (UN)CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUPREME COURT RECUSAL STANDARDS.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 6, p. 1181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
DISQUALIFYING JUDGES WHEN THEIR IMPARTIALITY MIGHT REASONABLY BE QUESTIONED: MOVING BEYOND A FAILED STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 2, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Disqualifying Judges when their Impartiality Might Reasonably be Questioned: Moving Beyond a Failed Standard.
- Published in:
- Judges Forum Review / Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, 2014, n. 2, p. 124
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN A TIME OF LEGAL REALISM.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2006, v. 56, n. 4, p. 937
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Current Issues in Judicial Disqualifications.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 639
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Attorney Speech and the Right to an Impartial Adjudicator.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 849
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
In Praise of Procedurally Centered Judicial Disqualification-and a Stronger Conception of the Appearance Standard: Better Acknowledging and Adjusting to Cognitive Bias, Spoliation, and Perceptual Realities.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 733
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 671
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
To Judge or Not to Judge: Transparency and Recusal in the Federal System.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada.
- Published in:
- Legal Ethics, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 134, doi. 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1346550
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Justice Ginsburg, President Trump, and the need for judicial disqualification reform.
- Published in:
- Legal Ethics, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 125, doi. 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1326433
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
"YOU'VE GOT YOUR CROOK, I'VE GOT MINE": WHY THE DISQUALIFICATION CLAUSE DOESN'T (ALWAYS) DISQUALIFY.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2014, v. 32, n. 2, p. 209
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION ON APPEAL.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 573
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
RECOVERING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY: TOWARD A DUTY-FOCUSED DISQUALIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE BASED ON JEWISH LAW.
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2011, v. 39, n. 2, p. 511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Judicial Disqualification in Minnesota.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2016, v. 73, n. 10, p. 16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Judicial Impartiality Resolution Leads Assembly Agenda.
- Published in:
- 2011
- Publication type:
- Proceeding
34
A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION: AN ANTIDOTE TO THE EFFECTS OF THE DECISIONS IN WHITE AND CITIZENS UNITED.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Judicial Elections and Recusal Standards.
- Published in:
- 2013
- Publication type:
- Editorial
36
Another successful National College on Judicial Conduct and Ethics concludes in Chicago.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Proceeding
37
Viewpoint.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
38
State judicial discipline in 2010.
- Published in:
- Judicature, 2011, v. 94, n. 5, p. 249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Father on the Bench: Justice William R. Day and Kinship Recusal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2021, v. 46, n. 1, p. 62, doi. 10.1111/jsch.12257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Codifying Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 95
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE WORKING GROUP ON JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Judicial Selection, Judicial Disqualification, and the Role of Money in Judicial Campaigns.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 85
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under the Due Process Clause.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 65
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification.
- Published in:
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 171
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Supreme Court removes Judge McMillan from the bench.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2001, v. 75, n. 8, p. 18
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Judicial Disqualification.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2000, v. 74, n. 9, p. 28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
DEFINING RIGHTS IN THE STATES: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND POPULAR RESPONSE.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 4, p. 2061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Romanian, Polish and German judge disqualification in disputes of administrative litigation.
- Published in:
- Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica, 2017, v. 7, p. 6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Annals of 'Constantin Brancusi' University of Targu-Jiu. Juridical Science Series, 2016, n. 1, p. 29
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
RETHINKING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION BASED ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS: A PRACTICAL CRITIQUE OF POST- CAPER TON PROPOSALS AND A CALL FOR GREATER TRANSPARENCY.
- Published in:
- Nevada Law Journal, 2011, v. 11, n. 3, p. 815
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article