الطبيعة القانونية لرد القضاة في التشريع الع ا رقي.
- Published in:
- Misan Journal of Academic Studies, 2023, v. 22, n. 45, p. 62
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "JUDICIAL recusal"
Results: 91
1
2
Reversal by Recusal? Comer v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc. and the Need for Mandatory Judicial Recusal Statements.
- Published in:
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 177
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
HOW HIGH IS TOO HIGH?: JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND RECUSAL AFTER CAPERTON.
- Published in:
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The New (and Improved) Judicial Recusal Law.
- Published in:
- Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 6, p. 362
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
IMPORTANT NOTICES.
- Published in:
- Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 4, p. 226
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Sub-regional Courts and the Recusal Issue: Emergent Practice of the East African Court of Justice.
- Published in:
- African Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 3, p. 365, doi. 10.3366/ajicl.2012.0041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
DECIDING RECUSAL MOTIONS: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1085
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
INTRODUCTION TO LESLIE W. ABRAMSON'S ARTICLE, DECIDING RECUSAL MOTIONS: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1083
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
RESHAPING RECUSAL PROCEDURES: ELIMINATING DECISIONMAKER BIAS AND PROMOTING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
THE SUPREME COURT AND RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR LUBET.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
11
SUPREME COURT LEAKS AND RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR STEVEN LUBET'S SCOTUS ETHICS IN THE WAKE OF NFIB V. SEBELIUS.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 925
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
LAW AND DISCRETION IN SUPREME COURT RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR LUBET.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 907
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2010, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
CATHOLIC JUDGES HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO RECUSE THEMSELVES IN CAPITAL CASES.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Impeachment by Any Other Name.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2022, v. 70, n. 5, p. 689
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG: A SURVEY OF THE PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE OF CANADIAN PROVINCIAL AND TERRITORIAL JUDGES CONCERNING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 3, p. 569, doi. 10.29173/alr144
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
The Composition of Judicial Benches, Disqualification and Excusal of Judges at the International Criminal Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 11, n. 2, p. 379, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqt005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
REINING IN RECUSALS.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2023, v. 2023, n. 6, p. 1821, doi. 10.59015/wlr.AXOB9070
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
STEP ONE TO RECUSAL REFORM: FIND AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE RULE OF NECESSITY.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 3, p. 623
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
THE (UN)CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUPREME COURT RECUSAL STANDARDS.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 6, p. 1181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Current Issues in Judicial Disqualifications.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 639
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
In Praise of Procedurally Centered Judicial Disqualification-and a Stronger Conception of the Appearance Standard: Better Acknowledging and Adjusting to Cognitive Bias, Spoliation, and Perceptual Realities.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 733
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 671
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
To Judge or Not to Judge: Transparency and Recusal in the Federal System.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Jackson v. Valdez and the Treatment of Transgender Americans in the Fifth Circuit.
- Published in:
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2022, v. 31, p. 195
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Pride and prejudice: a case for reform of judicial recusal procedure.
- Published in:
- Legal Ethics, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1261521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Tobacco, Recusals, and Sexual Assault Reforms: Correspondent's report from Australia.
- Published in:
- Legal Ethics, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 140, doi. 10.5235/146072811796372998
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Judicial Recusal, Spouses and Health Care Reforms: Correspondent's Report from the USA.
- Published in:
- Legal Ethics, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 138, doi. 10.5235/146072811796372989
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION ON APPEAL.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 573
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
The Elusive Goal of Impartiality.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 97, n. 1, p. 180
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
RECOVERING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY: TOWARD A DUTY-FOCUSED DISQUALIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE BASED ON JEWISH LAW.
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2011, v. 39, n. 2, p. 511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Judicial Disqualification in Minnesota.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2016, v. 73, n. 10, p. 16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
FEDERAL PRACTICE.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2010, v. 67, n. 11, p. 40
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Judicial Elections and Recusal Standards.
- Published in:
- 2013
- Publication type:
- Editorial
35
Social Networks and the Judiciary.
- Published in:
- 2013
- Publication type:
- Editorial
36
Another successful National College on Judicial Conduct and Ethics concludes in Chicago.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Proceeding
37
Viewpoint.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
38
THE TOO FRIENDLY JUDGE? SOCIAL NETWORKS AND THE BENCH.
- Published in:
- Judicature, 2010, v. 93, n. 6, p. 236
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Father on the Bench: Justice William R. Day and Kinship Recusal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2021, v. 46, n. 1, p. 62, doi. 10.1111/jsch.12257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
The Theory of Judicial Impartiality and the Case of Republic v Chief Justice Sereno.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2019, v. 19, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--DUE PROCESS CLAUSE--LITIGANT'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO JUDGE'S ELECTION CAMPAIGN REQUIRED JUDGE'S RECUSAL.
- Published in:
- Cumberland Law Review, 2009, v. 40, n. 2, p. 607
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Changing the Rules of the Game : Deriving New Rules and Practices from Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 3, p. 569
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
JUDICIAL RECUSAL IN NEW ZEALAND: LOOKING TO PROCEDURE AS THE PRINCIPLED WAY FORWARD.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
REWRITING JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES WITH BIG DATA.
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2020, n. 2, p. 383
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
REWRITING JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES WITH BIG DATA.
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 2, p. 383
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
The Trial of Maude Moore.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2010, v. 46, n. 9, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Reciprocity, Denial, and the Appearance of Impropriety: Why Self-Recusal Cannot Remedy the Influence of Campaign Contributions on Judges' Decisions.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
48
RECUSAL, GOVERNMENT ETHICS, AND SUPERANNUATED CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
49
Replacement Justice on the United States Supreme Court: The Use of Temporary Justices to Resolve the Recusal Conundrum.
- Published in:
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 215
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO NOW: FOREIGN LAW IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SUPREME COURT'S RECUSAL PROBLEM.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 4, p. 1195
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article