THE DOUBLE-SUMMARY TECHNIQUE IN DEBATE.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1946, v. 32, n. 4, p. 458, doi. 10.1080/00335634609381236
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "DEBATE judging"
Results: 27
1
2
IS THERE A YARDSTICK FOR MEASURING SPEAKING SKILL?
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1943, v. 29, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1080/00335634309380846
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
DECISION DEBATING: A PHILOSOPHY.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1942, v. 28, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1080/00335634209380718
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
DEBATERS JUDGE EACH OTHER.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1937, v. 23, n. 1, p. 74, doi. 10.1080/00335633709391659
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
HOW SHOULD DEBATES BE JUDGED?
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1935, v. 21, n. 3, p. 396, doi. 10.1080/00335633509380127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The Persuasive Power of Brain Scan Images.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2008, v. 8, n. 12, p. 60, doi. 10.1080/15265160802521021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Understanding arts audiences: existing data and what it tells us.
- Published in:
- Cultural Trends, 2008, v. 17, n. 2, p. 97, doi. 10.1080/09548960802090642
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
ASSESSING STUDENTS' ARGUMENTS.
- Published in:
- Science Scope, 2013, v. 36, n. 9, p. 51
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
JUDGE AND CRITIC.
- Published in:
- 1952
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter
10
SO THEY SAY.
- Published in:
- Western Speech, 1952, v. 16, n. 1, p. 24
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The Debate Judge and the Rhetorical Critic.
- Published in:
- Western Speech, 1952, v. 16, n. 1, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The Quality of Parliamentary Deliberation: The Case of the Family Code Debates in the Slovenian Parliament.
- Published in:
- Javnost-The Public, 2017, v. 24, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1267167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Temporal Patterns of Normative, Informational, and Procedural-Legal Discussion in Jury Deliberations.
- Published in:
- Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 1993, v. 14, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1207/s15324834basp1401_3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Constructing a Personal Individual Events Judging Philosophy.
- Published in:
- Forensic, 2013, v. 98, n. 2, p. 3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN POLITICAL SPEAKING: The 1976 Presidential Primary.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1976, v. 5, n. 1, p. 34
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
JUDGING INDIVIDUAL EVENTS.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1972, p. 124
- Publication type:
- Article
17
EVALUATING A DEBATE.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1972, p. 69
- Publication type:
- Article
18
DEBATE JUDGING TOOLS AND PROCEDURES.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1972, p. 46
- Publication type:
- Article
19
ACADEMIC DEBATE.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1972, p. 22
- Publication type:
- Article
20
JUDGING PRINCIPLES.
- Published in:
- Communication, 1972, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
The Debate Judge as a Machine.
- Published in:
- Today's Speech, 1956, v. 4, n. 2, p. 28, doi. 10.1080/01463375609384944
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NDT JUDGING PHILOSOPHIES 1977 THROUGH 1979.
- Published in:
- Florida Communication Journal, 1980, v. 8, n. 1, p. 15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Beyond tabula rasa.
- Published in:
- Argumentation & Advocacy, 1994, v. 30, n. 3, p. 174, doi. 10.1080/00028533.1994.11951585
- Publication type:
- Article
24
An analysis of differences in success rates of male and female debaters.
- Published in:
- Argumentation & Advocacy, 1994, v. 30, n. 3, p. 162, doi. 10.1080/00028533.1994.11951584
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Umfangslogik und analytisches Urteil bei Kant.
- Published in:
- Kant-Studien, 2010, v. 101, n. 3, p. 283, doi. 10.1515/KANT.2010.019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
FACTIONS IN POLICY DEBATE: SOME OBSERVATIONS.
- Published in:
- Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 2004, v. 25, p. 89
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Bush's straight talk erases Kerry's scholarly chalk. The U.S. presidential debate of 2004: Who won the image war?
- Published in:
- Semiotica, 2006, v. 2006, n. 162, p. 323, doi. 10.1515/SEM.2006.083
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article