Works matching DE "UNITED States v. Jones"
1
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1007/s12103-012-9185-z
- Hughes, Tom “Tad”;
- Burton, Corey
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 3, p. 729
- Article
4
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 329
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
6
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 663
- Article
7
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 803
- Article
8
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 685
- Article
9
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 745
- GRAY, DAVID;
- CITRON, DANIELLE KEATS;
- RINEHART, LIZ CLARK
- Article
10
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 985
- Article
11
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 349
- Article
12
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 29
- Robinson, David J.;
- Wykoff, Julia Kaye
- Article
13
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 475
- Article
14
- California Western Law Review, 2015, v. 51, n. 2, p. 263
- Article
15
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 553
- Article
17
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
18
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2011, p. 219
- Article
19
- Tennessee Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
20
- Minnesota Law Review, 2016, v. 100, n. 3, p. 985
- Issacharoff, Lucas;
- Wirshba, Kyle
- Article
21
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1609
- Article
22
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
23
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2018, v. 66, n. 2, p. 443
- Article
24
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 2, p. 329
- Article
25
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 31, n. 3, p. 925
- Article
26
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 843
- Article
27
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1809
- Article
28
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business, 2015, v. 20, p. 1
- Article
29
- New York Law School Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 4, p. 761
- Article
30
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 39, p. 337
- Article
31
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2015, v. 70, n. 3, p. 323
- Article
32
- Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 4, p. 1961
- Article
33
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1819
- Article
34
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 807
- Article
36
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1209
- Article
37
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 997
- Article
38
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 359
- Article
39
- Georgia Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 2, p. 445
- Article
40
- Stanford Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 3, p. 677
- Article
41
- North Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
42
- Hamline Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 467
- Article
43
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 531
- Article
44
- South Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 450
- Article
45
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 4, p. 485
- Article
46
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 111, n. 3, p. 311
- Article
47
- Arkansas Law Notes, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 531
- Article
48
- Communication Law & Policy, 2017, v. 22, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2017.1331637
- Article
49
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 619
- Article
50
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 395
- Article