Works matching DE "LEGAL status of artists"
3
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 339
- Article
4
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 28, n. 4, p. 451
- Article
5
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 28, n. 4, p. 435
- Article
6
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 28, n. 4, p. 419
- Article
7
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 28, n. 4, p. 397
- Article
8
- International Labour Review, 1973, v. 107, n. 4, p. 303
- Article
10
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2015, n. 96, p. 167
- Article
11
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2012, n. 80, p. 167
- Article
12
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2010, n. 69, p. 33
- Article
13
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2010, n. 68, p. 45
- Article
14
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2008, n. 61, p. 74
- Article
15
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2011, v. 14, p. 385
- Article
16
- St. John's Law Review, 2021, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1073
- Article
17
- Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 2009, v. 39, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1080/10632920903218547
- Article
18
- Journal of International Media & Entertainment Law, 2012, v. 4, n. 2, p. 111
- Article
19
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 6, p. 2003
- Article
20
- Michigan Law Review, 2011, v. 110, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
21
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2013, n. 2, p. 77
- Article
22
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 122, n. 1, p. 218
- Article
23
- Revista Telos, 2010, v. 12, n. 2, p. 141
- Logreira Rivas, Carmen Isabel;
- Fuentes Pinzón, Fernando José
- Article
24
- SMU Law Review, 2023, v. 76, n. 4, p. 975, doi. 10.25172/smulr.76.4.8
- Article
25
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2015, v. 35, n. 3, p. 281
- Article
26
- Cumberland Law Review, 2008, v. 39, n. 3, p. 749
- Norton, Anne Belle Wilder
- Article
27
- Chapman Law Review, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 119
- Steiner, Christine;
- Bee-Seon Keum
- Article
28
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 1, p. 239
- Article
29
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, v. 29, n. 1, p. 215
- Article
30
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
31
- Modern Language Journal (Wiley-Blackwell), 1950, v. 34, n. 6, p. 487, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1950.tb04910.x
- Article
32
- Anuario de Propiedad Intelectual, 2020, n. 2019, p. 335
- Article
33
- Anuario de Propiedad Intelectual, 2020, n. 2019, p. 319
- Article
34
- History Today, 1952, v. 2, n. 8, p. 544
- Article
35
- Temple Law Review, 2011, v. 84, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
36
- California Law Review, 2009, v. 97, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
37
- California Law Review, 1992, v. 80, n. 2, p. 471, doi. 10.2307/3480771
- Article
38
- California Law Review, 1989, v. 77, n. 6, p. 1431, doi. 10.2307/3480684
- Article
39
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2012, v. 3, n. 1, p. 55
- Moss, Aaron J.;
- Basin, Kenneth
- Article
40
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2020, v. 65, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
41
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2010, v. 54, n. 4, p. 817
- Article
42
- North Carolina Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 4, p. 1001
- Article
43
- UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 329, doi. 10.5070/lr8192027156
- Article
44
- Kentucky Libraries, 2014, v. 78, n. 3, p. 10
- Article
45
- American Business Law Journal, 2015, v. 52, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.1111/ablj.12047
- McKelvey, Steve;
- Sliffman, Ari J.
- Article
46
- Advocate (05154987), 2016, v. 59, n. 5, p. 32
- Article
47
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1618
- Article
48
- Judges' Journal, 2024, v. 63, n. 4, p. 26
- Article
49
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 325
- Article