British legislation against caste-based discrimination and the demand for the sunset clause.

Takhar, Opinderjit Kaur

On 23 April 2013, British Parliament agreed an Amendment on caste to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill (ERR Bill). The Bill received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013 and Section 97 of the ERR Act (that provides that Government ‘shall’ use Section 9(5)a to make caste an aspect of race) came into force on 25 June 2013. The Amendment will be made to the Equality Act 2010 by ‘adding caste as “an aspect of” the protected characteristic of race’ [Waughray, Annapurna. (2014). “Capturing Caste in Law: Caste Discrimination and the Equality Act 2010.”Human Rights Law Review14 (2): 359–379.]. Importantly, although the Government’s timetable states that the legislation will be enforced not before October 2015, the considerable delay in implementation is consequential of the opposition from both Sikh and Hindu organisations. Most British Sikhs agreed that legislation against caste discrimination was unnecessary under British law. The Sikh Council UK (SCUK) declared that ‘caste allegiances were on their way out in the UK’ and demanded a Sunset Clause which essentially renders the caste legislation as temporary for a period of ten years, since the credence of the SCUK is that caste will have absolutely no significance for subsequent generations of British Sikhs. This paper provides an analysis of attitudes, primarily from the British Sikh and Punjabi Dalit communities, towards caste discrimination legislation in British Law, and in particular attitudes towards the proposal of the Sunset Clause.

UNITED Kingdom; CASTE discrimination; GREAT Britain. Parliament; EQUALITY Act 2010 (Great Britain); REGULATORY reform; SIKHS; DALITS; HISTORY; LAW

Contemporary South Asia, 2017, Vol 25, Issue 3, p301

0958-4935

Academic Journal

10.1080/09584935.2017.1353587