Works matching Three strikes laws
1
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
3
- Atlantic Economic Journal, 2017, v. 45, n. 2, p. 225, doi. 10.1007/s11293-017-9544-8
- Article
4
- Te Mata Koi: Auckland University Law Review, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 428
- Article
5
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2010, v. 22, n. 3, p. 171, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2010.22.3.171
- Article
6
- Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2023, v. 38, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
7
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2004, v. 21, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1080/07418820400095791
- Kovandzic, Tomislav V.;
- Sloan III, John J.;
- Vieraitis, Lynne M.
- Article
8
- Stanford Law & Policy Review, 2010, v. 21, n. 2, p. 311
- Article
9
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2014, v. 13, n. 4, p. 503, doi. 10.1111/1745-9133.12097
- Article
10
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 649
- Article
11
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1087
- Article
12
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2003, v. 33, n. 1, p. 110, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02076.x
- Ramirez, Juan R.;
- Crano, William D.
- Article
13
- Law & Society Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1111/lasr.12001
- Article
14
- California Law Review, 2002, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1157, doi. 10.2307/3481327
- Article
15
- Texas Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
16
- Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2008, v. 6, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1080/15377930802096462
- Article
18
- Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2001, v. 17, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1023/A:1011098100458
- Article
19
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 3, p. 755
- Article
20
- North Dakota Law Review, 2004, v. 80, n. 3, p. 497
- Article
21
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 25, n. 4, p. 265, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.25.4.265
- MILLS, DAVID;
- ROMANO, MICHAEL
- Article
22
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 25, n. 4, p. 263, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.25.4.263
- COOLEY, STEVE;
- RUBIN, LAEL R.
- Article
24
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2014, v. 31, n. 2, p. 257, doi. 10.1080/07418825.2011.649693
- Article
25
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2013, v. 27, n. 1/2, p. 60, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2013.764137
- Article
26
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2018, v. 43, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
27
- American Ethnologist, 2017, v. 44, n. 4, p. 711, doi. 10.1111/amet.12579
- Article
28
- Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
29
- Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 2003, v. 22, n. 4, p. 55, doi. 10.1300/J113v22n04_04
- Article
30
- Journal of Classical Sociology, 2009, v. 9, n. 4, p. 371, doi. 10.1177/1468795X09344448
- Article
31
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2005, v. 16, n. 4, p. 443, doi. 10.1177/0887403405277001
- Johnson, Jeffry L.;
- Saint-Germain, Michelle A.
- Article
32
- Law & Policy, 1998, v. 20, n. 4, doi. 10.1111/1467-9930.00057
- Article
33
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2003, v. 27, n. 1, p. 399
- Article
35
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2002, v. 1, n. 3, p. 399, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00100.x
- Kovandzic, Tomislav V.;
- Sloan III, John J.;
- Vieraitis, Lynne M.
- Article
36
- Howard Journal of Communications, 2006, v. 17, n. 3, p. 183, doi. 10.1080/10646170600829584
- Abraham, Linus;
- Appiah, Osei
- Article
37
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 3, p. 629
- Article
38
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2019, v. 30, n. 5, p. 663, doi. 10.1177/0887403416684594
- Article
39
- Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2008, v. 24, n. 4, p. 345, doi. 10.1177/1043986208319456
- Article
40
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2009, v. 5, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
41
- Cardozo Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1373
- Article
42
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 1, p. 488
- Article
43
- Review of Law & Economics, 2009, v. 5, n. 1, p. 252, doi. 10.2202/1555-5879.1326
- Tabarrok, Alexander;
- Helland, Eric
- Article
44
- Law & Policy, 2024, v. 46, n. 2, p. 112, doi. 10.1111/lapo.12233
- Chen, Elsa Y.;
- Chung, Emily;
- Sands, Emily
- Article
45
- European Journal of Social Law / Revue Européenne du Droit Social, 2024, v. 65, n. 4, p. 52, doi. 10.53373/REDS.2024.65.4.0181
- POPA-ROMAN, Gioni;
- FĂGHIAN, Cătălin
- Article
46
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2010, v. 22, n. 3, p. 133, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2010.22.3.133
- RAPPAPORT, AARON;
- DANSKY, KARA
- Article
47
- ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 1999, v. 56, n. 3, p. 333
- Article
48
- Challenge (05775132), 1996, v. 39, n. 5, p. 42, doi. 10.1080/05775132.1996.11471925
- Greenwood, Peter;
- Model, Karyn;
- Rydell, C. Peter;
- Chiesa, James
- Article
49
- Forensic Examiner, 1999, v. 8, n. 5/6, p. 22
- Article
50
- Law, Technology & Humans, 2022, v. 4, n. 2, p. 152, doi. 10.5204/lthj.2333
- Article