Works matching DE "PHILOSOPHY of punishment"
1
- Metaphilosophy, 2012, v. 43, n. 1/2, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01726.x
- Article
3
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1017
- Article
4
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2018, v. 37, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2018.1449364
- Article
5
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2018, v. 37, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2018.1441227
- Article
6
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2017, v. 36, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2017.1301487
- Article
7
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2017, v. 36, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2017.1298879
- Article
8
- International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2014, v. 18, n. 11, p. 1091, doi. 10.1080/13603116.2013.875068
- Chitiyo, Morgan;
- Chitiyo, George;
- Chitiyo, Jonathan;
- Oyedele, Victoria;
- Makoni, Richard;
- Fonnah, Davidson;
- Chipangure, Luke
- Article
9
- Alabama Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
10
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
11
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 141
- Article
12
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 131
- Article
13
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 119
- Article
14
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 109
- Article
15
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 95
- Pérez Bermejo, Juan Manuel
- Article
20
- Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.1353/hph.2014.0025
- Article
22
- Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2012, v. 93, n. 2, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01424.x
- Article
23
- Journal of Value Inquiry, 2014, v. 48, n. 4, p. 643, doi. 10.1007/s10790-014-9463-8
- Article
25
- Collected Papers of Zagreb Law Faculty / Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 2019, v. 69, n. 3, p. 411, doi. 10.3935/zpfz.69.3.04
- Article
26
- Arizona Quarterly, 2016, v. 72, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1353/arq.2016.0007
- Article
28
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2019, v. 22, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1007/s10677-018-9966-7
- Article
30
- Philosophy of Science, 2016, v. 83, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.1086/684166
- Article
31
- Law & Philosophy, 2013, v. 32, n. 4, p. 459, doi. 10.1007/s10982-012-9147-0
- Article
32
- Analysis, 2017, v. 77, n. 3, p. 619, doi. 10.1093/analys/anw022
- Article
33
- Nova Tellus, 2018, v. 36, n. 2, p. 9, doi. 10.19130/iifl.nt.2018.36.2.794
- Article
34
- Journal of Ethics, 2016, v. 20, n. 4, p. 385, doi. 10.1007/s10892-016-9217-x
- Article
36
- Philosophical Forum, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1111/phil.12066
- Article
41
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 429, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095319
- Article
42
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 401, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095318
- Article
43
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 375, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095317
- Article
44
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 355, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095316
- AJZENSTADT, MIMI;
- BARAK, ARIEL
- Article
45
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1177/1462474507087196
- Article
46
- Science & Engineering Ethics, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 505, doi. 10.1007/s11948-013-9462-3
- Article
47
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, v. 37, n. 1, p. 217, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqw003
- Article
48
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2010, v. 30, n. 4, p. 775, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqq027
- Article
49
- Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 2016, v. 98, n. 3, p. 302, doi. 10.1515/agph-2016-0014
- Article
50
- Contemporary Justice Review, 2017, v. 20, n. 4, p. 442, doi. 10.1080/10282580.2017.1383774
- Article