A Reply to Mendaglio and Tillier.

Piechowski, Michael M.

When Dąbrowski cast his theory in a series of formal statements (hypotheses), he was clear that the hypotheses were tentative and that new research findings will necessitate changes and revisions in the theory and its concepts. Mendaglio and Tillier see the theory as cast in stone and invariable: Dąbrowski’s “choice of terms and their definitions cannot be a focus of criticism: after all, TPD is his theory.” Consequently, Mendaglio and Tillier blindly stand by even the most absurd, inadvertently erroneous statements that are contradicted by the whole theory.

DABROWSKI, Kasimierz; INTEGRATION (Theory of knowledge); NEUROSES; PERSONALITY development; PSYCHOLOGY

Roeper Review, 2015, Vol 37, Issue 4, p229

0278-3193

Academic Journal

10.1080/02783193.2015.1077496