To Brexit or not to Brexit? A Preliminary Analysis.
- Published in:
- Sphere of Politics / Sfera Politicii, 2016, v. 24, n. 3/4, p. 53
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "PARLIAMENTARY sovereignty"
Results: 85
1
2
Top‐Down Constitutional Conventions.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2018, v. 81, n. 5, p. 765, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12364
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Devotion to Legalism: On the Brexit Case.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 4, p. 696, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12280
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 4, p. 711, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12281
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union: Three Competing Syllogisms.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 4, p. 726, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12282
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Hidden Law-Making in the Province of Medical Jurisprudence.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 3, p. 343, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12070
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Australia's Future as a 'Westminster Democracy' - threats to combat, stark choices to make...
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
8
CONSTITUTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF THE PARLIAMENTARY INVESTIGATION POWER.
- Published in:
- Juridical Current, 2014, v. 17, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
DEUX THÈSES SUR LA DÉMOCRATIE ET LE CONSTITUTIONNALISME: LA SOUVERAINETÉ DU PEUPLE ET L'ENGAGEMENT PRÉALABLE.
- Published in:
- Revue de Droit: Université de Sherbrooke, 2011, v. 41, n. 3, p. 583, doi. 10.17118/11143/10312
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
An Interlude of Agreement? A Reassessment of the Conference on Devolution's ‘Consensus’ on Powers.
- Published in:
- Contemporary British History, 2015, v. 29, n. 4, p. 421, doi. 10.1080/13619462.2015.1015421
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE SLOW TRANSFORMATION OF THE UK'S "POLITICAL CONSTITUTION".
- Published in:
- Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eotvos Nominatae: Sectio Iuridica, 2012, v. 53, p. 239
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Parliamentary sovereignty and the locus of constituent power in the United Kingdom.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2020, v. 18, n. 4, p. 1166, doi. 10.1093/icon/moaa100
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Losing Ireland, losing the Empire: Dominion status and the Irish Constitutions of 1922 and 1937.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2019, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1192, doi. 10.1093/icon/moz085
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Searching for constitutional meaning in institutional design: The debate over judicial appointments in the United Kingdom.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2016, v. 14, n. 3, p. 752, doi. 10.1093/icon/mow044
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
BREXIT: JUDICIAL REVIEW, PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY AND REFERENDUM.
- Published in:
- Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Română de Drept Comparat, 2018, v. 9, n. 1, p. 223
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The Emile Lousse Essay Prize 2019 competition.
- Published in:
- Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 2019, v. 39, n. 1, p. 156, doi. 10.1080/02606755.2019.1575579
- Publication type:
- Article
17
‘Royal supremacy restored?’ Scottish parliamentary independence in the Restoration era, 1660–88.
- Published in:
- Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1080/02606755.2014.946827
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Scottish sovereignty and the union of 1707: Then and now.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
19
PROTECTING PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN A DUALIST FEDERATION.
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2020, v. 58, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.29173/alr2615
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
- Published in:
- Legal Studies, 2012, v. 32, n. 4, p. 577, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00234.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Nothing to See Here? Allister in the Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.3366/elr.2024.0875
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Can Holyrood Bind its Successors?
- Published in:
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2021, v. 25, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.3366/elr.2021.0700
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Once More unto the Breach: R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
- Published in:
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2020, v. 24, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.3366/elr.2020.0605
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Brexit and parliamentary sovereignty – the Europeanisation of the House of Commons and MPs' rising role conflicts.
- Published in:
- Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 2021, v. 29, n. 4, p. 452, doi. 10.1080/14782804.2021.1895732
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Considerations regarding the political statement of members of Parliament.
- Published in:
- Petroleum - Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Law & Social Sciences Series, 2013, v. 64, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Questions and interpellations - concrete and direct means of exerting parliamentary control.
- Published in:
- Petroleum - Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Law & Social Sciences Series, 2013, v. 64, n. 1, p. 39
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Parliamentary Divorce, 1700-1857.
- Published in:
- Parliamentary History, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.1111/j.1750-0206.2012.00310.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Extending the Role of the Courts: The Human Rights Act 1998.
- Published in:
- Parliamentary History, 2011, v. 30, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1111/j.1750-0206.2010.00243.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
The Right Honourable Boris Johnson MP v The Prime Minister: A (fictional) Entrenchment Problem – and Solution (?).
- Published in:
- King's Law Journal, 2022, v. 33, n. 3, p. 411, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2022.2123125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Political Constitution(s): From Griffith to Brexit.
- Published in:
- King's Law Journal, 2019, v. 30, n. 1, p. 125, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2019.1594614
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Brexit, the Constitution and the Alternatives.
- Published in:
- King's Law Journal, 2016, v. 27, n. 3, p. 314, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2016.1253220
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
The Institutional Power of Western European Parliaments: A Multidimensional Analysis.
- Published in:
- West European Politics, 2011, v. 34, n. 4, p. 731, doi. 10.1080/01402382.2011.572389
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The New Parliamentary Sovereignty.
- Published in:
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
The institutional development of Legislative Supporting Agencies (LSAs) focusing on the differences among parliamentary-system countries.
- Published in:
- Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 2022, v. 42, n. 3, p. 324, doi. 10.1080/02606755.2022.2138190
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Folksuveränitet oeh parlamentets suveränitet i tidigare brittiska kolonier.
- Published in:
- Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 2012, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
The Principle of Legality: Protecting Statutory Rights from Statutory Infringement?
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 73
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
TWO GRAND OLD LADIES FACE TO FACE: THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTIONS COMPARED.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 3, p. 989
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
BEYOND PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY: THE DOCTRINE OF IMPLICIT LIMITS TO CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN LATIN AMERICA.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 3/4, p. 521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
PRESIDENTIALISATION OF PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEMS? FRONTRUNNER CONCENTRATION IN DANISH LOCAL ELECTIONS.
- Published in:
- Representation, 2013, v. 49, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/00344893.2013.805698
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Against Written Constitutionalism.
- Published in:
- Otago Law Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 1, p. 191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Constitutional Collision: Fitzgerald v Muldoon v Wild.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
42
Parliament's Constitution: Legislative Disruption of Implied Repeal.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2023, v. 43, n. 2, p. 429, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqad004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Changing Concepts of the Constitution.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, v. 42, n. 3, p. 758, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqac001
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Strained Interpretations.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, v. 39, n. 2, p. 316, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqz001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
The Manner and Form Theory of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Nelson's Eye View of the UK Constitution?
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2018, v. 38, n. 1, p. 168, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqy003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Imprisoned by a Doctrine: The Modern Defence of Parliamentary Sovereignty †.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 179, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqr027
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
COMMON LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM.
- Published in:
- New Zealand Journal of Public & International Law, 2016, v. 14, n. 2, p. 153
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
THE PEOPLE'S CHARTER: A VIEW FROM THE COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION.
- Published in:
- Parliamentarian, 2023, v. 104, n. 3, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
FIT-FOR-PURPOSE PARLIAMENT: REVIEWING AND ENHANCING PARLIAMENTARY EFFECTIVENESS: A case study of the Parliament of New Zealand.
- Published in:
- Parliamentarian, 2019, v. 100, n. 3, p. 214
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARLIAMENT AND THE JUDICIARY: AN EXPERT'S VIEW.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion