"Direct to Drug" screening as a precision medicine tool in multiple myeloma.

Bonolo de Campos, Cecilia; Meurice, Nathalie; Petit, Joachim L.; Polito, Alysia N.; Zhu, Yuan Xiao; Wang, Panwen; Bruins, Laura A.; Wang, Xuewei; Lopez Armenta, Ilsel D.; Darvish, Susie A.; Ahmann, Greg J.; Henderson, Kimberly J.; Tian, Shulan; Kruse, Jonas J.; Stewart, William M.; Larsen, Jeremy T.; Reeder, Craig B.; Dingli, David; Kapoor, Prashant; Kumar, Shaji K.

Seventy-six FDA-approved oncology drugs and emerging therapeutics were evaluated in 25 multiple myeloma (MM) and 15 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines and in 113 primary MM samples. Ex vivo drug sensitivities were mined for associations with clinical phenotype, cytogenetic, genetic mutation, and transcriptional profiles. In primary MM samples, proteasome inhibitors, dinaciclib, selinexor, venetoclax, auranofin, and histone deacetylating agents had the broadest cytotoxicity. Of interest, newly diagnosed patient samples were globally less sensitive especially to bromodomain inhibitors, inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases or non-receptor kinases, and DNA synthesis inhibitors. Clustering demonstrated six broad groupings of drug sensitivity linked with genomic biomarkers and clinical outcomes. For example, our findings mimic clinical observations of increased venetoclax responsiveness in t(11;14) patients but also identify an increased sensitivity profile in untreated patients, standard genetic risk, low plasma cell S-Phase, and in the absence of Gain(1q) and t(4;14). In contrast, increased ex vivo responsiveness to selinexor was associated with biomarkers of poor prognosis and later relapse patients. This "direct to drug" screening resource, paired with functional genomics, has the potential to successfully direct appropriate individualized therapeutic approaches in MM and to enrich clinical trials for likely responders.

MULTIPLE myeloma diagnosis; INDIVIDUALIZED medicine; CELL lines; DNA synthesis; MEDICAL screening; PROTEIN-tyrosine kinases

Blood Cancer Journal, 2020, Vol 10, Issue 5, p1

2044-5385

Academic Journal

10.1038/s41408-020-0320-7