Found: 20
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Recommendation: Add a competency on diversity and inclusion.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 84, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
IOP volume 13 issue 1 Cover and Back matter.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. b1, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.23
- Publication type:
- Article
An empirical exploration of reviewers' and editors' roles fostering high quality research during peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Split roles in peer reviewing.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 68, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.20
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Is the future of leadership development wearable? Exploring self-tracking in leadership programs.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Peer review and role conflict.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 48, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
IOP volume 13 issue 1 Cover and Front matter.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. f1, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.22
- Publication type:
- Article
Reviewing is its own reward ... but should it be? Incentivizing peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.14
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Leadership concepts in manufacturing environments: A brief historical review and conclusion with recommendations for education and training of I-O psychologists.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 90, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
In our English-only research world, there is a need for reviewers who are tolerant of imperfect texts from non-anglophone authors.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.12
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Quality standards and training are important in the peer review process, but what about engagement?
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Context matters: Developing peer reviewers to advance science and practice.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 57, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
About competencies and situations: A trait-activation approach to the competency framework for peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Lack of expertise means it is not a peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Navigating the review process through the holier than thou.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 72, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Using results-blind reviewing to support the peer review competency framework.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 28, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Should you sign your reviews? Open peer review and review quality.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1017/iop.2020.5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review.
- Published in:
- Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/iop.2019.121
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article