Works matching DE "PRODUCT counterfeiting laws"
1
- CLEAR International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 2017, v. 8, n. 11, p. 58
- Article
2
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2011, v. 17, n. 3, p. 254, doi. 10.1057/jcb.2011.17
- Article
3
- African Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2010, v. 18, n. 2, p. 238, doi. 10.3366/ajicl.2010.0007
- VON BRAUN, JOHANNA;
- MUNYI, PETER
- Article
4
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2014, v. 43, n. 3, p. 527
- Article
5
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2014, v. 43, n. 3, p. 507
- Article
6
- Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law, 2016, n. 2, p. 41
- Losis, Egidijus;
- Khatsernova, Sofia
- Article
7
- Alberta Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 3, p. 677, doi. 10.29173/alr113
- JUDGE, ELIZABETH F.;
- AL-SHARIEH, SALEH
- Article
8
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2220
- Article
9
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2014, v. 17, n. 1/2, p. 16, doi. 10.1002/jwip.12020
- Harrington, John;
- O'Hare, Alasdair
- Article
10
- Asian Journal of Law & Society, 2018, v. 5, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1017/als.2017.31
- Article
11
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2016, n. 3, p. 97
- Article
12
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2016, n. 2, p. 98
- Article
13
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2015, n. 4, p. 184
- Article
14
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2013, v. 24, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
15
- Michigan Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 32, n. 4, p. 613
- Article
16
- Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 2014, v. 52, p. 437, doi. 10.1017/cyl.2015.12
- LOGVIN, ALEXANDRA;
- VANDERHEYDEN, ANDREA
- Article
17
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 591
- Article
18
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 1, p. 491
- Article
19
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 903
- Article
20
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 839
- Article
21
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 811
- Article
22
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 783
- Article
23
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 645
- RUSE - KHAN, HENNING GROSSE
- Article
24
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 601
- Article
25
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 579
- Article
26
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 559
- Article
27
- American University International Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 543
- Article
28
- Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, v. 155, n. 2, p. 479, doi. 10.1007/s10551-017-3479-5
- Davidson, Alexander;
- Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal;
- Laroche, Michel
- Article
29
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2014, v. 32, n. 2, p. 101
- MARTÍNEZ, DIANNA MICHELLE
- Article
30
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 6, p. 425, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz049
- Article
33
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 4, p. 262, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv031
- Schneider, Marius;
- Maillefer, Christophe
- Article
35
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 465
- Article
36
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, v. 30, n. 2, p. 165
- Article
37
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, v. 30, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
38
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
39
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2008, v. 26, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
40
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 127
- Article
41
- Michigan State International Law Review, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
42
- New York Law School Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 195
- Article
43
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 1, p. 55
- Article
44
- Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2023, v. 58, n. 5, p. 2024, doi. 10.1017/S0022109022001387
- Canayaz, Mehmet I.;
- Gurun, Umit G.
- Article
45
- Romanian Journal of Forensic Science, 2017, v. 18, n. 3, p. 2611
- Article
46
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2014, v. 14, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.5235/14729342.14.1.21
- Article
47
- Chinese Law & Government, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609450104
- Article
48
- Journal of Marketing, 1955, v. 19, n. 4, p. 378
- Article
49
- Journal of International Economic Law, 2012, v. 15, n. 2, p. 361, doi. 10.1093/jiel/jgs018
- Article
50
- SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 2017, v. 14, n. 3, p. 5
- Hyde, Olivia;
- Kulkarni, Kishore G.
- Article