To cite or not to cite: author self-citations and the impact factor.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 313, doi. 10.1007/s11192-011-0568-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 01389130 AND DT 2012 AND VI 92 AND IP 2
Results: 29
1
2
Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 211, doi. 10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The impact factor: its place in Garfield's thought, in science evaluation, and in library collection management.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.1007/s11192-011-0601-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Positive and negative aspects of citation indices and journal impact factors.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 241, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0637-5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Updating the journal impact factor or total overhaul?
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 413, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0649-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 409, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0634-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Some research ideas on Journal Impact Factors as a crucial topic in science dynamics.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 293, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0650-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 277, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0656-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Journal report card.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0671-3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 377, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0670-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 355, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0660-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Decades of progress, or the progress of decades?
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 391, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0678-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
What do the scientists think about the impact factor?
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 281, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: revision of earlier comments.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 443, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0677-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 429, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0669-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The Garfield impact factor, one of the fundamental indicators in scientometrics.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 471, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0688-7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 419, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0685-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay's article 2011.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 485, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0697-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 395, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0689-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The Impact Factor in non-English-speaking countries.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 297, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0692-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
The pragmatics of a diachronic journal impact factor.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 319, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0701-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 367, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0679-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Evaluating journal performance metrics.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 403, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0746-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 457, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0747-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Editorial.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
26
Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay's criticism.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 325, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Erratum to: Journal report card.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Correction Notice
28
Comments on the Discussion Paper.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 239, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0815-5
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Discussion Paper.
- Published in:
- Scientometrics, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 209, doi. 10.1007/s11192-012-0814-6
- Publication type:
- Article