Works matching DE "LEGAL maxims"
1
- Social Forces, 1928, v. 6, n. 4, p. 539, doi. 10.2307/3004332
- Article
2
- Statute Law Review, 2001, v. 22, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1093/slr/22.1.45
- Article
3
- Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia, 2013, n. 1, p. 178
- Article
4
- Vocabula Review, 2012, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1
- Article
5
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2001, v. 56, n. 2, p. 87
- Article
6
- Anali Pravnog Fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici, 2010, p. 199
- Article
7
- Ius Canonicum, 2011, v. 51, n. 101, p. 137
- Article
8
- Journal of the American Oriental Society, 2020, v. 140, n. 4, p. 927, doi. 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.4.0927
- Article
9
- Slovenian Law Review, 2006, v. 3, n. 1/2, p. 103
- Article
10
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1923, v. 14, n. 1, p. 62, doi. 10.2307/1133764
- Article
11
- New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 2022, v. 54, n. 3, p. 1053
- Article
12
- Arizona Law Review, 2013, v. 55, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
13
- Global Jurist, 2017, v. 17, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1515/gj-2017-0010
- Article
14
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 4, p. 965
- Article
15
- Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, 2005, v. 32, n. 2, p. 151
- Article
16
- Journal of Ethics, 2006, v. 10, n. 1/2, p. 53, doi. 10.1007/s10892-005-4593-7
- Article
17
- Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2006, v. 44, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1353/hph.2006.0001
- Article
18
- Queen's Law Journal, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 262
- Article
19
- Arbitration International, 2012, v. 28, n. 4, p. 669, doi. 10.1093/arbitration/28.4.669
- Article
20
- History of European Ideas, 2015, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1080, doi. 10.1080/01916599.2015.1077152
- Article
21
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 3, p. 673
- Article