Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents.

Pavlovic, Z.; Hammer, K. C.; Raff, M.; Patel, P.; Kunze, K. N.; Kaplan, B.; Coughlin, C.; Hirshfeld-Cytron, J.

Purpose: To determine whether gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles (commissioned cycles) for same-sex or single male intended parents have an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with spontaneous cycles in the same GCs. Design: GC singleton pregnancies were identified from a database of 895 commissioned cycles from a large fertility center. Of these, 78 commissioned cycles met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were compared with 71 spontaneous cycles by the same GCs. The primary outcome was the composite score for adverse perinatal outcomes. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, birthweight, and gestational age. Chi-square test of association and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables between the cohorts, respectively. Logistic and linear regressions controlling for GC age were constructed to determine the influence of GC cycle type on adverse perinatal outcomes. Results: Commissioned cycles were significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (25.6% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.02) and lower average gestational age (38.7 ± 1.5 vs. 39.4 ± 0.9; p < 0.001) compared with spontaneous cycles. Commissioned cycle increased the likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes (OR 3.3; p = 0.03) and was a significant independent predictor of a lower average gestational age (β = 0.897; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of vaginal deliveries or cesarean sections between commissioned and spontaneous cycles. Conclusions: Commissioned cycles confer a greater incidence of composite perinatal complications and were independently associated with a lower average gestational age when compared with spontaneous pregnancies carried by the same GC despite a confirmed healthy uterine environment, sperm samples, and donor oocytes.

Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 2020, Vol 37, Issue 4, p953

1058-0468

Academic Journal

10.1007/s10815-020-01728-3