Egg cylinder development during in vitro extended embryo culture predicts the post transfer developmental potential of mouse blastocysts.

Logsdon, Deirdre M.; Ermisch, Alison F.; Kile, Rebecca; Schoolcraft, William B.; Krisher, Rebecca L.; Yuan, Ye

Purpose: To establish parameters during mouse extended embryo culture that accurately predict fetal developmental potential of a blastocyst without performing embryo transfer. Methods: Embryos of three varying qualities were produced: poor quality embryos produced from in vitro matured oocytes (IVM), intermediate quality embryos produced from in vivo matured oocytes followed by in vitro fertilization and embryo culture (IVF); high quality embryos developed in vivo (VIVO). Embryonic day (E) 3.5 embryos from each group with similar morphologies were used for surgical embryo transfer to assess implantation and fetal developmental potential, in addition to placing these embryos into extended culture until E 8.5 to examine outgrowth area, egg cylinder volume, epiblast cell number, and outgrowth morphologies by immunofluorescence and 3D confocal microscopy. Results: The proportional differences in epiblast cell number are strikingly similar to fetal development following embryo transfer, suggesting that this parameter may be indicative of the potential of an embryo to successfully develop into a fetus. Conclusion: Extended embryo culture provides more accurate information regarding developmental potential than blastocyst morphological assessment. Specifically, epiblast cell number is an accurate and valuable predictor of fetal developmental potential. This work sets the stage for routine evaluation of embryo quality past the time embryos would normally be transferred. The ability to determine post implantation potential without embryo transfer may greatly improve efforts to culture higher quality embryos in vitro for human IVF, as well as reducing animal use and eliminating confounding maternal factors associated with embryo transfer experiments in research.

Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 2020, Vol 37, Issue 4, p747

1058-0468

Academic Journal

10.1007/s10815-020-01714-9