The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice.

Coffman, Makena; Umemoto, Karen

Sustainability principles are at the forefront of regional planning. In Hawaii, the movement toward “sustainability” gave way to revisiting the State Plan. This paper uses a case study of the Hawaii 2050 Sustainability Plan ( Hawaii 2050) to illustrate how adopting popular notions of sustainability, without critical examination of how the respective policy frames diverge or interrelate, can lead to “tautological traps.” In the case of Hawaii 2050, the “triple-bottom-line” (embedded within sustainable development) became the dominant sustainability frame during the solicitation of public input and was thus used to guide the planning discourse. The application of triple-bottom-line concepts at the level of policy and planning led to a process that polarized economic and environmental interests. While the goals of sustainable development and the use of triple-bottom-line concepts are useful for planners, we argue that they should be applied within the parameters of ecological sustainability in a US regional context, lest resulting plans continue to allow the momentum of development to override ecological concerns.

HAWAII; SUSTAINABLE development; ENVIRONMENTAL engineering; HUMAN settlements; ECONOMIC development

Environment, Development & Sustainability, 2010, Vol 12, Issue 5, p597

1387-585X

Academic Journal

10.1007/s10668-009-9213-4