Results: 8
Logical Cornestones of Judaic Argumentation Theory.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 3, p. 305, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9273-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
On the Rationale for Distinguishing Arguments from Explanations.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 3, p. 283, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9288-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Bakó, Bernáth, Biróné Kaszás, Györgyjakab and Horváth (eds): Argumentor, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation and Rhetoric.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
Burdens of Proof and the Case for Unevenness.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 3, p. 259, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9285-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
What Students' Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 3, p. 225, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9284-5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 3, p. 245, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9286-3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review